FUJHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mitsubishi Motors has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of -0.69%. Subaru's return on equity of 18.52% beat Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 10.25%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi Motors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Motors, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Mitsubishi Motors.

Subaru has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.622%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Mitsubishi Motors offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Motors pays out 9.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are larger than Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Mitsubishi Motors's net income of -$31M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while Mitsubishi Motors's PE ratio is 6.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.23x for Mitsubishi Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mazda Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of 4.26%. Subaru's return on equity of 18.52% beat Mazda Motor's return on equity of 13.23%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mazda Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Mazda Motor, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Mazda Motor.

Subaru has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.622, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.79%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Mazda Motor offers a yield of 6.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor pays out 15.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Mazda Motor quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Mazda Motor's net income of $362.2M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while Mazda Motor's PE ratio is 2.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.11x for Mazda Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nissan Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of -0.45%. Subaru's return on equity of 18.52% beat Nissan Motor's return on equity of 4.97%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nissan Motor has an analysts' consensus of $6.95 which suggests that it could grow by 38.95%. Given that Nissan Motor has higher upside potential than Subaru, analysts believe Nissan Motor is more attractive than Subaru.

Subaru has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nissan Motor has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.361%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Nissan Motor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Nissan Motor pays out 13.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Nissan Motor quarterly revenues of $20.7B. Subaru's net income of $1B is higher than Nissan Motor's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while Nissan Motor's PE ratio is 4.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.11x for Nissan Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 12.15% compared to Subaru's net margin of 17.7%. Subaru's return on equity of 18.52% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 14.19%.

Subaru has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru has higher upside potential than Toyota Motor, analysts believe Subaru is more attractive than Toyota Motor.

Subaru has a beta of 0.441, which suggesting that the stock is 55.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.444%.

Subaru has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.88%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Subaru pays 16.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru quarterly revenues are $8.3B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.2B. Subaru's net income of $1B is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $14.4B. Notably, Subaru's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.22x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru is 0.40x versus 0.75x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.