DNMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -253.06% compared to Danimer Scientific's net margin of -0.63%. Danimer Scientific's return on equity of -43.3% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Danimer Scientific has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Danimer Scientific has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Danimer Scientific is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Danimer Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.

Danimer Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Danimer Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Danimer Scientific quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Danimer Scientific's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Danimer Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danimer Scientific is 0.12x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -253.06% compared to Danimer Scientific's net margin of 1.61%. Danimer Scientific's return on equity of -43.3% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Danimer Scientific has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Danimer Scientific has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Danimer Scientific is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Danimer Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.032%.

Danimer Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Danimer Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Danimer Scientific quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Danimer Scientific's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Danimer Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danimer Scientific is 0.12x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -253.06% compared to Danimer Scientific's net margin of --. Danimer Scientific's return on equity of -43.3% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Danimer Scientific has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Danimer Scientific, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Danimer Scientific.

Danimer Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Danimer Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Danimer Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Danimer Scientific quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Danimer Scientific's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Danimer Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danimer Scientific is 0.12x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -253.06% compared to Danimer Scientific's net margin of --. Danimer Scientific's return on equity of -43.3% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Danimer Scientific has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 203.03%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Danimer Scientific has higher upside potential than Solitario Resources, analysts believe Danimer Scientific is more attractive than Solitario Resources.

Danimer Scientific has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Danimer Scientific has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Danimer Scientific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Danimer Scientific quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Danimer Scientific's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Danimer Scientific's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danimer Scientific is 0.12x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.