NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Buy
52
ANFGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.89
Seasonality move
:
8.49%
Day range:
$20.89 - $20.89
52-week range:
$19.90 - $30.88
Dividend yield:
1.54%
P/E ratio:
26.95x
P/S ratio:
3.22x
P/B ratio:
2.29x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
224
1-year change:
-4.94%
Market cap:
$20.6B
Revenue:
$6.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.78
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANFGF
Antofagasta PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$443.5M | $0.21 | 4.54% | -66.67% | -- |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$10.6B | $1.96 | -2.78% | 123.66% | $93.86 |
|
NGLOY
Anglo American PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $82.20 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANFGF
Antofagasta PLC
|
$20.89 | -- | $20.6B | 26.95x | $0.08 | 1.54% | 3.22x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
$0.05 | -- | $26.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.41x |
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$3.87 | -- | $726.2M | 16.10x | $0.01 | 1.35% | 0.44x |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$73.50 | $93.86 | $23.9B | 11.19x | $1.34 | 7.17% | 0.59x |
|
NGLOY
Anglo American PLC
|
$14.70 | -- | $35.6B | 123.00x | $0.21 | 2.82% | 1.21x |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
$58.64 | $82.20 | $95.2B | 8.91x | $1.77 | 7.42% | 1.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANFGF
Antofagasta PLC
|
35.86% | -0.287 | 16.7% | 1.83x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | 0.284 | -- | 3.53x |
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
8.7% | 0.567 | 8.68% | 0.90x |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
45.08% | 0.530 | 36.01% | 1.10x |
|
NGLOY
Anglo American PLC
|
42.57% | -2.444 | 39.47% | 1.32x |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
18.91% | -0.225 | 11.82% | 1.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANFGF
Antofagasta PLC
|
-- | -- | 4.79% | 6.37% | -- | -- |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | -- | -14.46% | -14.46% | -- | -- |
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$159.6M | $40.6M | 4.42% | 4.65% | 7.85% | -$10M |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$1.2B | $807M | 8.76% | 16.1% | 8.03% | $302M |
|
NGLOY
Anglo American PLC
|
-- | -- | -3.41% | -5.18% | -- | -- |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | 15.69% | 19.33% | -- | -- |
Antofagasta PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANFGF or EDNSF?
Eden Research PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of --. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.37% beat Eden Research PLC's return on equity of -14.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANFGFAntofagasta PLC-- -- $17.3B EDNSFEden Research PLC-- -- $16.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ANFGF or EDNSF?
Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eden Research PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Antofagasta PLC has higher upside potential than Eden Research PLC, analysts believe Antofagasta PLC is more attractive than Eden Research PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANFGFAntofagasta PLC0 0 0 EDNSFEden Research PLC0 0 0 -
Is ANFGF or EDNSF More Risky?
Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eden Research PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANFGF or EDNSF?
Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Eden Research PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 73.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Eden Research PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Antofagasta PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANFGF or EDNSF?
Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eden Research PLC quarterly revenues of --. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than Eden Research PLC's net income of --. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.95x while Eden Research PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.22x versus 5.41x for Eden Research PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANFGFAntofagasta PLC3.22x 26.95x -- -- EDNSFEden Research PLC5.41x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANFGF or GSM?
Ferroglobe PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of 4.34%. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.37% beat Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANFGFAntofagasta PLC-- -- $17.3B GSMFerroglobe PLC36.81% $0.10 $869.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ANFGF or GSM?
Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferroglobe PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 132.86%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Antofagasta PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Antofagasta PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANFGFAntofagasta PLC0 0 0 GSMFerroglobe PLC0 0 0 -
Is ANFGF or GSM More Risky?
Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.658%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANFGF or GSM?
Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Ferroglobe PLC offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 73.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Antofagasta PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANFGF or GSM?
Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues of $433.5M. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.95x while Ferroglobe PLC's PE ratio is 16.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.22x versus 0.44x for Ferroglobe PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANFGFAntofagasta PLC3.22x 26.95x -- -- GSMFerroglobe PLC0.44x 16.10x $433.5M $18.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANFGF or LYB?
LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of 5.52%. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.37% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 16.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANFGFAntofagasta PLC-- -- $17.3B LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV12.03% $1.75 $25.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ANFGF or LYB?
Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $93.86 which suggests that it could grow by 27.7%. Given that LyondellBasell Industries NV has higher upside potential than Antofagasta PLC, analysts believe LyondellBasell Industries NV is more attractive than Antofagasta PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANFGFAntofagasta PLC0 0 0 LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV4 12 1 -
Is ANFGF or LYB More Risky?
Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANFGF or LYB?
Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 7.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 73.44% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 76.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANFGF or LYB?
Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $10.3B. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of $570M. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.95x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 11.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.22x versus 0.59x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANFGFAntofagasta PLC3.22x 26.95x -- -- LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV0.59x 11.19x $10.3B $570M
-
Which has Higher Returns ANFGF or NGLOY?
Anglo American PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of --. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.37% beat Anglo American PLC's return on equity of -5.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANFGFAntofagasta PLC-- -- $17.3B NGLOYAnglo American PLC-- -- $48.7B -
What do Analysts Say About ANFGF or NGLOY?
Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Anglo American PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.49%. Given that Anglo American PLC has higher upside potential than Antofagasta PLC, analysts believe Anglo American PLC is more attractive than Antofagasta PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANFGFAntofagasta PLC0 0 0 NGLOYAnglo American PLC0 0 0 -
Is ANFGF or NGLOY More Risky?
Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Anglo American PLC has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.185%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANFGF or NGLOY?
Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Anglo American PLC offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 73.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Anglo American PLC pays out 552.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Antofagasta PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Anglo American PLC's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANFGF or NGLOY?
Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Anglo American PLC quarterly revenues of --. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than Anglo American PLC's net income of --. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.95x while Anglo American PLC's PE ratio is 123.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.22x versus 1.21x for Anglo American PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANFGFAntofagasta PLC3.22x 26.95x -- -- NGLOYAnglo American PLC1.21x 123.00x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANFGF or RIO?
Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Antofagasta PLC's net margin of --. Antofagasta PLC's return on equity of 6.37% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 19.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANFGFAntofagasta PLC-- -- $17.3B RIORio Tinto PLC-- -- $70B -
What do Analysts Say About ANFGF or RIO?
Antofagasta PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 40.18%. Given that Rio Tinto PLC has higher upside potential than Antofagasta PLC, analysts believe Rio Tinto PLC is more attractive than Antofagasta PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANFGFAntofagasta PLC0 0 0 RIORio Tinto PLC5 0 0 -
Is ANFGF or RIO More Risky?
Antofagasta PLC has a beta of 1.123, which suggesting that the stock is 12.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.849%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANFGF or RIO?
Antofagasta PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Antofagasta PLC pays 73.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 64.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANFGF or RIO?
Antofagasta PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Antofagasta PLC's net income of -- is lower than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Antofagasta PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.95x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Antofagasta PLC is 3.22x versus 1.77x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANFGFAntofagasta PLC3.22x 26.95x -- -- RIORio Tinto PLC1.77x 8.91x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is down 2.5% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 3.2% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 6.14% over the past day.
