Down 50%, Is Dell Technologies a Buy?
Dell (NYSE:DELL)’s share price has been on a roller coaster…
Sell
10
GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.31
Seasonality move
:
-1.57%
Day range:
$2.97 - $3.21
52-week range:
$2.97 - $6.19
Dividend yield:
1.7%
P/E ratio:
155.50x
P/S ratio:
0.36x
P/B ratio:
0.72x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
-40.19%
Market cap:
$584.3M
Revenue:
$1.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$336M | -$0.12 | -14.25% | -1050% | $9.00 |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$7.5B | $0.50 | -22.5% | -53.7% | $79.01 |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $78.69 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$3.11 | $9.00 | $584.3M | 155.50x | $0.01 | 1.7% | 0.36x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
$0.04 | -- | $18.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.79x |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
$1.8100 | -- | $381.8M | 17.16x | $0.01 | 2.14% | 0.87x |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
$2.06 | -- | $811.7M | 42.70x | $0.02 | 3.14% | 1.75x |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$53.23 | $79.01 | $17.2B | 12.83x | $1.34 | 10.07% | 0.43x |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
$52.32 | $78.69 | $85B | 7.40x | $2.25 | 7.68% | 1.59x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
7.62% | 0.193 | 9.43% | 0.93x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | 0.513 | -- | 3.53x |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
30.8% | -1.672 | 22.39% | 0.65x |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
24.87% | -1.366 | 28.74% | 0.41x |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
47.22% | 0.481 | 46.11% | 1.03x |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
18.38% | -0.080 | 12.67% | 0.91x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$97.7M | -$6.5M | 0.58% | 0.61% | -13.37% | $14.1M |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | -- | -14.46% | -14.46% | -- | -- |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
-- | -- | 5.43% | 8.11% | -- | -- |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
-- | -- | 2.86% | 3.82% | -- | -- |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$750M | $285M | 5.59% | 10.32% | -8.02% | $1.4B |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | 16.52% | 20.21% | -- | -- |
Ferroglobe PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or EDNSF?
Eden Research PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Eden Research PLC's return on equity of -14.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC26.59% -$0.25 $883.4M EDNSFEden Research PLC-- -- $16.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.39%. On the other hand Eden Research PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Eden Research PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Eden Research PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 EDNSFEden Research PLC0 0 0 -
Is GSM or EDNSF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eden Research PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Eden Research PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 186.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Eden Research PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Eden Research PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Eden Research PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.50x while Eden Research PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.36x versus 3.79x for Eden Research PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.36x 155.50x $367.5M -$46.4M EDNSFEden Research PLC3.79x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or FTTRF?
Forterra PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Forterra PLC's return on equity of 8.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC26.59% -$0.25 $883.4M FTTRFForterra PLC-- -- $407.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.39%. On the other hand Forterra PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Forterra PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Forterra PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 FTTRFForterra PLC0 0 0 -
Is GSM or FTTRF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forterra PLC has a beta of 1,398.537, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139753.711%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Forterra PLC offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 186.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Forterra PLC pays out 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Forterra PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ferroglobe PLC's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Forterra PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Forterra PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.50x while Forterra PLC's PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.36x versus 0.87x for Forterra PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.36x 155.50x $367.5M -$46.4M FTTRFForterra PLC0.87x 17.16x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or IBJHF?
Ibstock PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Ibstock PLC's return on equity of 3.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC26.59% -$0.25 $883.4M IBJHFIbstock PLC-- -- $660.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.39%. On the other hand Ibstock PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Ibstock PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Ibstock PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 IBJHFIbstock PLC0 0 0 -
Is GSM or IBJHF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibstock PLC has a beta of -0.171, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.06%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Ibstock PLC offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 186.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibstock PLC pays out 132.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Ibstock PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Ibstock PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.50x while Ibstock PLC's PE ratio is 42.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.36x versus 1.75x for Ibstock PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.36x 155.50x $367.5M -$46.4M IBJHFIbstock PLC1.75x 42.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or LYB?
LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of -6.3%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 10.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC26.59% -$0.25 $883.4M LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV7.9% -$1.86 $23.7B -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or LYB?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.39%. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $79.01 which suggests that it could grow by 48.42%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than LyondellBasell Industries NV, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than LyondellBasell Industries NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV5 13 2 -
Is GSM or LYB More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.998%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or LYB?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 10.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 186.15% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 126.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or LYB?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of -$598M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.50x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 12.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.36x versus 0.43x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.36x 155.50x $367.5M -$46.4M LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV0.43x 12.83x $9.5B -$598M
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or RIO?
Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of -12.63% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 0.61% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 20.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC26.59% -$0.25 $883.4M RIORio Tinto PLC-- -- $70.4B -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or RIO?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 189.39%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $78.69 which suggests that it could grow by 50.4%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Rio Tinto PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Rio Tinto PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC1 1 0 RIORio Tinto PLC5 0 0 -
Is GSM or RIO More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.581, which suggesting that the stock is 58.072% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.660, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.951%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or RIO?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays 186.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 60.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ferroglobe PLC's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or RIO?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $367.5M, which are larger than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$46.4M is higher than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.50x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 7.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.36x versus 1.59x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.36x 155.50x $367.5M -$46.4M RIORio Tinto PLC1.59x 7.40x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How Bad Will the Stock Market Get?
In recent trading days, global stock markets have seen massive…
Is JOBY Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Joby Aviation (NYSE:JOBY) got started with the big idea of…
Stock Ideas
Sell
36
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
30
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Sell
33
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
55
SLNO alert for Apr 9
Soleno Therapeutics [SLNO] is up 7.3% over the past day.
Sell
20
HELE alert for Apr 9
Helen Of Troy [HELE] is up 10.1% over the past day.
Sell
18
OXM alert for Apr 9
Oxford Industries [OXM] is up 17.72% over the past day.
