Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Sell
37
FLRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.72
Seasonality move
:
-1.17%
Day range:
$30.69 - $30.72
52-week range:
$30.32 - $30.88
Dividend yield:
5.68%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
490K
Avg. volume:
752.5K
1-year change:
0.52%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
$30.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 5.68% | -- |
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
$50.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 5.53% | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
$50.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 5.82% | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
$25.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 5.99% | -- |
|
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
|
$48.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 4.98% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.002 | -- | -- |
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.147 | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
|
-- | 0.120 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLRN or FLDR?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net margin of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLRN or FLDR?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF, analysts believe SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLRN or FLDR More Risky?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 92.028% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a beta of 0.195, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLRN or FLDR?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.68%. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF offers a yield of 5.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLRN or FLDR?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -- FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLRN or FLOT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net margin of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLRN or FLOT?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF, analysts believe SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is more attractive than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLRN or FLOT More Risky?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 92.028% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.019%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLRN or FLOT?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.68%. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLRN or FLOT?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLRN or FLTR?
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net margin of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLRN or FLTR?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, analysts believe SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is more attractive than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLRN or FLTR More Risky?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 92.028% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.566%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLRN or FLTR?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.68%. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF offers a yield of 5.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLRN or FLTR?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLRN or VNLA?
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net margin of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of -- beat Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- VNLAJanus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLRN or VNLA?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has higher upside potential than Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF, analysts believe SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is more attractive than Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 VNLAJanus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLRN or VNLA More Risky?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 92.028% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF has a beta of 0.141, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.935%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLRN or VNLA?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.68%. Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF offers a yield of 4.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLRN or VNLA?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net income of -- is lower than Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF is -- versus -- for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -- VNLAJanus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 26
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is down 1.59% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 2.8% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 26
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 0.67% over the past day.
