How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Sell
39
FLDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.07
Seasonality move
:
-0.96%
Day range:
$50.01 - $50.10
52-week range:
$49.70 - $50.49
Dividend yield:
5.53%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
137.4K
Avg. volume:
107.2K
1-year change:
-0.02%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ULST
SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UYLD
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
$50.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 5.53% | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
$50.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 5.82% | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
$30.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 5.68% | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
$25.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 5.99% | -- |
|
ULST
SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
|
$40.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 5.04% | -- |
|
UYLD
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
|
$51.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 5.5% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.147 | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.002 | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
ULST
SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.119 | -- | -- |
|
UYLD
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
|
-- | 0.082 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ULST
SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UYLD
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLDR or FLOT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLDR or FLOT?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is more attractive than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF0 0 0 FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLDR or FLOT More Risky?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.019%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLDR or FLOT?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLDR or FLOT?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLDR or FLRN?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLDR or FLRN?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is more attractive than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF0 0 0 FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLDR or FLRN More Risky?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.080, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.028%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLDR or FLRN?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF offers a yield of 5.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLDR or FLRN?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- -- FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLDR or FLTR?
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLDR or FLTR?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is more attractive than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF0 0 0 FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLDR or FLTR More Risky?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.566%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLDR or FLTR?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF offers a yield of 5.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLDR or FLTR?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLDR or ULST?
SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- ULSTSPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLDR or ULST?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is more attractive than SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF0 0 0 ULSTSPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLDR or ULST More Risky?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.168%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLDR or ULST?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLDR or ULST?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- -- ULSTSPDR SSGA Ultra Short Term Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLDR or UYLD?
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- UYLDAngel Oak UltraShort Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLDR or UYLD?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is more attractive than Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF0 0 0 UYLDAngel Oak UltraShort Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLDR or UYLD More Risky?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a beta of 0.195, which suggesting that the stock is 80.534% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLDR or UYLD?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.53%. Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLDR or UYLD?
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLDRFidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF-- -- -- -- UYLDAngel Oak UltraShort Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
60
QMCO alert for Dec 26
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
53
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.
