Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Sell
49
ECNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.74
Seasonality move
:
1.87%
Day range:
$25.73 - $25.97
52-week range:
$20.81 - $33.04
Dividend yield:
5.93%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
23K
Avg. volume:
13.4K
1-year change:
4.61%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
$25.74 | -- | -- | -- | $1.04 | 5.93% | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
$28.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.67% | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
$28.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.14% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$20.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 5.09% | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
$17.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 4.39% | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$23.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.44% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.373 | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | 0.793 | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | 1.337 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.857 | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.336 | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 1.726 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ECNS
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ECNS or ASHS?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECNS or ASHS?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECNS or ASHS More Risky?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.389%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECNS or ASHS?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECNS or ASHS?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECNS or CNXT?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECNS or CNXT?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck ChiNext ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck ChiNext ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is more attractive than VanEck ChiNext ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECNS or CNXT More Risky?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.344%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECNS or CNXT?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. VanEck ChiNext ETF offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECNS or CNXT?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck ChiNext ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck ChiNext ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECNS or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECNS or FCA?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is ECNS or FCA More Risky?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.838, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.162%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECNS or FCA?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 5.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECNS or FCA?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECNS or FLHK?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECNS or FLHK?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECNS or FLHK More Risky?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECNS or FLHK?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECNS or FLHK?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ECNS or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ECNS or KGRN?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF0 0 0 KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is ECNS or KGRN More Risky?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.578% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.094%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ECNS or KGRN?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.93%. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ECNS or KGRN?
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ECNSiShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF-- -- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is down 3.22% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 4.72% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is down 4.82% over the past day.
