WOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of -0.88%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $6.46, signalling upside risk potential of 199%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.56 which suggests that it could grow by 17.33%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Intel.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.35x versus 1.55x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 56.17%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $6.46, signalling upside risk potential of 199%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $167.33 which suggests that it could grow by 60.14%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 35.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.35x versus 19.86x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ON Semiconductor has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 22.06%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat ON Semiconductor's return on equity of 18.85%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $6.46, signalling upside risk potential of 199%. On the other hand ON Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72.28%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than ON Semiconductor, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than ON Semiconductor.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ON Semiconductor has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.569%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ON Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ON Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than ON Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than ON Semiconductor's net income of $379.9M. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ON Semiconductor's PE ratio is 9.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.35x versus 2.09x for ON Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Instruments has a net margin of -206.21% compared to Wolfspeed's net margin of 30.07%. Wolfspeed's return on equity of -120.58% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.14%.

Wolfspeed has a consensus price target of $6.46, signalling upside risk potential of 199%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $198.53 which suggests that it could grow by 36.41%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.397%.

Wolfspeed has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Wolfspeed pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wolfspeed quarterly revenues are $180.5M, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4B. Wolfspeed's net income of -$372.2M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Wolfspeed's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 28.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wolfspeed is 0.35x versus 8.61x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.