WK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackLine has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 33.29%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat BlackLine's return on equity of 43.72%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $119.24, signalling upside risk potential of 34.63%. On the other hand BlackLine has an analysts' consensus of $64.80 which suggests that it could grow by 31.76%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than BlackLine, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than BlackLine.

Workiva has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackLine has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.08%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlackLine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackLine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are larger than BlackLine quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than BlackLine's net income of $56.4M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackLine's PE ratio is 33.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 6.64x versus 5.53x for BlackLine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 11.89%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $119.24, signalling upside risk potential of 34.63%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $705.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.19%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than Intuit, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than Intuit.

Workiva has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.049%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 56.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 6.64x versus 9.94x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Associates has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 18.77%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $119.24, signalling upside risk potential of 34.63%. On the other hand Manhattan Associates has an analysts' consensus of $244.10 which suggests that it could grow by 38.97%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Workiva, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Workiva.

Workiva has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.871%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Associates offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Associates pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are smaller than Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues of $255.8M. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Manhattan Associates's PE ratio is 50.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 6.64x versus 10.48x for Manhattan Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPS Commerce has a net margin of -4.41% compared to Workiva's net margin of 10.27%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat SPS Commerce's return on equity of 10.31%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $119.24, signalling upside risk potential of 34.63%. On the other hand SPS Commerce has an analysts' consensus of $200.14 which suggests that it could grow by 56.1%. Given that SPS Commerce has higher upside potential than Workiva, analysts believe SPS Commerce is more attractive than Workiva.

Workiva has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.208%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPS Commerce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPS Commerce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $199.9M, which are larger than SPS Commerce quarterly revenues of $170.9M. Workiva's net income of -$8.8M is lower than SPS Commerce's net income of $17.6M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPS Commerce's PE ratio is 63.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 6.64x versus 7.65x for SPS Commerce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.