WK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Business Travel Group has a net margin of -9.15% compared to Workiva's net margin of -21.61%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -14.17%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $120.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Global Business Travel Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.22%. Given that Global Business Travel Group has higher upside potential than Workiva, analysts believe Global Business Travel Group is more attractive than Workiva.

Workiva has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Business Travel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Business Travel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $185.6M, which are smaller than Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues of $597M. Workiva's net income of -$17M is higher than Global Business Travel Group's net income of -$129M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Business Travel Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 8.95x versus 1.84x for Global Business Travel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of -9.15% compared to Workiva's net margin of 6%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.36%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $120.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $728.08 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Workiva, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Workiva.

Workiva has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $185.6M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Workiva's net income of -$17M is lower than Intuit's net income of $197M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 62.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 8.95x versus 11.00x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of -9.15% compared to Workiva's net margin of 16.21%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 33.33%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $120.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $222.75 which suggests that it could grow by 7.49%. Given that Paycom Software has higher upside potential than Workiva, analysts believe Paycom Software is more attractive than Workiva.

Workiva has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.196%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 19.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $185.6M, which are smaller than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $451.9M. Workiva's net income of -$17M is lower than Paycom Software's net income of $73.3M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 24.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 8.95x versus 6.45x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zuora has a net margin of -9.15% compared to Workiva's net margin of -27.54%. Workiva's return on equity of -- beat Zuora's return on equity of -47.73%.

Workiva has a consensus price target of $120.38, signalling upside risk potential of 4.88%. On the other hand Zuora has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.91%. Given that Workiva has higher upside potential than Zuora, analysts believe Workiva is more attractive than Zuora.

Workiva has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zuora has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.511%.

Workiva has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zuora offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Workiva pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zuora pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Workiva quarterly revenues are $185.6M, which are larger than Zuora quarterly revenues of $116.9M. Workiva's net income of -$17M is higher than Zuora's net income of -$32.2M. Notably, Workiva's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zuora's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Workiva is 8.95x versus 3.24x for Zuora. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.