MANH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agilysys has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 5.51%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $244.10, signalling upside risk potential of 38.99%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $133.25 which suggests that it could grow by 73.5%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is higher than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.03x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 96.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.48x versus 8.21x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alarm.com Holdings has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 12.52%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 16.88%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $244.10, signalling upside risk potential of 38.99%. On the other hand Alarm.com Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $73.88 which suggests that it could grow by 27.9%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Alarm.com Holdings, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Alarm.com Holdings.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.863%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alarm.com Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alarm.com Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are larger than Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues of $242.2M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is higher than Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.03x while Alarm.com Holdings's PE ratio is 25.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.48x versus 3.56x for Alarm.com Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 14.32%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Bentley Systems's return on equity of 24.08%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $244.10, signalling upside risk potential of 38.99%. On the other hand Bentley Systems has an analysts' consensus of $55.55 which suggests that it could grow by 31.7%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Bentley Systems, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Bentley Systems.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bentley Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bentley Systems offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems pays out 30.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are smaller than Bentley Systems quarterly revenues of $349.8M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is lower than Bentley Systems's net income of $50.1M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.03x while Bentley Systems's PE ratio is 57.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.48x versus 10.40x for Bentley Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 18.77% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of -12.88%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 81.75% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of -1.31%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $244.10, signalling upside risk potential of 38.99%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $210.92 which suggests that it could grow by 8.97%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.586%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $255.8M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $289.5M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $48M is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of -$37.3M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.03x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 519.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.48x versus 14.95x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.