MANH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Agilysys has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 5.51%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $205.11, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $122.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.71%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.955%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 92.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.29x versus 7.92x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alarm.com Holdings has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 12.52%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Alarm.com Holdings's return on equity of 16.88%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $205.11, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Alarm.com Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $69.88 which suggests that it could grow by 31.74%. Given that Alarm.com Holdings has higher upside potential than Manhattan Associates, analysts believe Alarm.com Holdings is more attractive than Manhattan Associates.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alarm.com Holdings has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.41%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alarm.com Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alarm.com Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are larger than Alarm.com Holdings quarterly revenues of $242.2M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Alarm.com Holdings's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while Alarm.com Holdings's PE ratio is 23.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.29x versus 3.27x for Alarm.com Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of 14.32%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Bentley Systems's return on equity of 24.08%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $205.11, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Bentley Systems has an analysts' consensus of $50.90 which suggests that it could grow by 17.18%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Bentley Systems, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Bentley Systems.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bentley Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bentley Systems offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems pays out 30.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Bentley Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are smaller than Bentley Systems quarterly revenues of $349.8M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Bentley Systems's net income of $50.1M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while Bentley Systems's PE ratio is 59.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.29x versus 10.72x for Bentley Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Guidewire Software has a net margin of 20.01% compared to Manhattan Associates's net margin of -12.88%. Manhattan Associates's return on equity of 83.36% beat Guidewire Software's return on equity of -1.31%.

Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $205.11, signalling upside risk potential of 17.49%. On the other hand Guidewire Software has an analysts' consensus of $210.72 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that Manhattan Associates has higher upside potential than Guidewire Software, analysts believe Manhattan Associates is more attractive than Guidewire Software.

Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guidewire Software has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.113%.

Manhattan Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Guidewire Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manhattan Associates pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guidewire Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Manhattan Associates quarterly revenues are $262.8M, which are smaller than Guidewire Software quarterly revenues of $289.5M. Manhattan Associates's net income of $52.6M is higher than Guidewire Software's net income of -$37.3M. Notably, Manhattan Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.88x while Guidewire Software's PE ratio is 519.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manhattan Associates is 10.29x versus 15.25x for Guidewire Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.