ULS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LegalZoom.com has a net margin of 12.04% compared to UL Solutions's net margin of 6.56%. UL Solutions's return on equity of 35.73% beat LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24%.

UL Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand LegalZoom.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.36%. Given that UL Solutions has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe UL Solutions is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UL Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. LegalZoom.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UL Solutions pays 261.54% of its earnings as a dividend. LegalZoom.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UL Solutions quarterly revenues are $731M, which are larger than LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues of $168.6M. UL Solutions's net income of $88M is higher than LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M. Notably, UL Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.70x while LegalZoom.com's PE ratio is 60.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UL Solutions is 3.63x versus 2.16x for LegalZoom.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Team has a net margin of 12.04% compared to UL Solutions's net margin of -5.28%. UL Solutions's return on equity of 35.73% beat Team's return on equity of -152.04%.

UL Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Team has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 750.23%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than UL Solutions, analysts believe Team is more attractive than UL Solutions.

UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.464%.

UL Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Team offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UL Solutions pays 261.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Team pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UL Solutions quarterly revenues are $731M, which are larger than Team quarterly revenues of $210.8M. UL Solutions's net income of $88M is higher than Team's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, UL Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.70x while Team's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UL Solutions is 3.63x versus 0.08x for Team. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 12.04% compared to UL Solutions's net margin of 15.4%. UL Solutions's return on equity of 35.73% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99%.

UL Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.99%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than UL Solutions, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than UL Solutions.

UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.947%.

UL Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UL Solutions pays 261.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UL Solutions quarterly revenues are $731M, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $225.6M. UL Solutions's net income of $88M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M. Notably, UL Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.70x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 40.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UL Solutions is 3.63x versus 4.64x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of 12.04% compared to UL Solutions's net margin of -7.2%. UL Solutions's return on equity of 35.73% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.74%.

UL Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.43%. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $33.70 which suggests that it could fall by -22.88%. Given that UL Solutions has higher upside potential than Xometry, analysts believe UL Solutions is more attractive than Xometry.

UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UL Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UL Solutions pays 261.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UL Solutions quarterly revenues are $731M, which are larger than Xometry quarterly revenues of $141.7M. UL Solutions's net income of $88M is higher than Xometry's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, UL Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.70x while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UL Solutions is 3.63x versus 4.05x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.