VRRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AtlasClear Holdings has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -15.28%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat AtlasClear Holdings's return on equity of --.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 33.41%. On the other hand AtlasClear Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 170096.64%. Given that AtlasClear Holdings has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe AtlasClear Holdings is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AtlasClear Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AtlasClear Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AtlasClear Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than AtlasClear Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than AtlasClear Holdings's net income of -$419.7K. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.24x while AtlasClear Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.16x versus 0.01x for AtlasClear Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 6.75%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 33.41%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 61.29%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.24x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 38.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.16x versus 2.02x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The OLB Group has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of -52.86%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat The OLB Group's return on equity of -181.38%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 33.41%. On the other hand The OLB Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2757.14%. Given that The OLB Group has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe The OLB Group is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The OLB Group has a beta of 1.466, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.638%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The OLB Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The OLB Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are larger than The OLB Group quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than The OLB Group's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.24x while The OLB Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.16x versus 0.11x for The OLB Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progress Software has a net margin of -30.09% compared to Verra Mobility's net margin of 4.6%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63% beat Progress Software's return on equity of 13.14%.

Verra Mobility has a consensus price target of $29.08, signalling upside risk potential of 33.41%. On the other hand Progress Software has an analysts' consensus of $72.43 which suggests that it could grow by 25.53%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Progress Software, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Progress Software.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progress Software has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.165%.

Verra Mobility has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progress Software offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Verra Mobility pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software pays out 45.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Progress Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Verra Mobility quarterly revenues are $221.5M, which are smaller than Progress Software quarterly revenues of $238M. Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M is lower than Progress Software's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Verra Mobility's price-to-earnings ratio is 128.24x while Progress Software's PE ratio is 44.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Verra Mobility is 4.16x versus 3.18x for Progress Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.