TREX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Trex's net margin of 11.82%. Trex's return on equity of 29.86% beat Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 19.45%.

Trex has a consensus price target of $81.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.88%. On the other hand Fortune Brands Innovations has an analysts' consensus of $89.87 which suggests that it could grow by 31.72%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Trex, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Trex.

Trex has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.983%.

Trex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fortune Brands Innovations offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Trex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 28.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trex quarterly revenues are $233.7M, which are smaller than Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Trex's net income of $40.6M is lower than Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $136.6M. Notably, Trex's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.70x while Fortune Brands Innovations's PE ratio is 19.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trex is 6.40x versus 1.85x for Fortune Brands Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JELD-WEN Holding has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Trex's net margin of -7.96%. Trex's return on equity of 29.86% beat JELD-WEN Holding's return on equity of -19.47%.

Trex has a consensus price target of $81.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.88%. On the other hand JELD-WEN Holding has an analysts' consensus of $12.10 which suggests that it could grow by 51.82%. Given that JELD-WEN Holding has higher upside potential than Trex, analysts believe JELD-WEN Holding is more attractive than Trex.

Trex has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JELD-WEN Holding has a beta of 2.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.988%.

Trex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JELD-WEN Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JELD-WEN Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trex quarterly revenues are $233.7M, which are smaller than JELD-WEN Holding quarterly revenues of $934.7M. Trex's net income of $40.6M is higher than JELD-WEN Holding's net income of -$74.4M. Notably, Trex's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.70x while JELD-WEN Holding's PE ratio is 86.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trex is 6.40x versus 0.17x for JELD-WEN Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Trex's net margin of 10.24%. Trex's return on equity of 29.86% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15%.

Trex has a consensus price target of $81.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.88%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $222.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Trex, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Trex.

Trex has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.42%.

Trex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Trex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trex quarterly revenues are $233.7M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $983.8M. Trex's net income of $40.6M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M. Notably, Trex's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.70x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 22.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trex is 6.40x versus 2.65x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Trex's net margin of 11.8%. Trex's return on equity of 29.86% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64%.

Trex has a consensus price target of $81.15, signalling upside risk potential of 16.88%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.35 which suggests that it could grow by 9.96%. Given that Trex has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Trex is more attractive than PACCAR.

Trex has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.982% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.304%.

Trex has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Trex pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trex quarterly revenues are $233.7M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Trex's net income of $40.6M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $972.1M. Notably, Trex's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.70x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trex is 6.40x versus 1.58x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.