THR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ideal Power has a net margin of 8.28% compared to Thermon Group Holdings's net margin of -485622.38%. Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.34% beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -59.68%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.29%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 85.68%. Given that Ideal Power has higher upside potential than Thermon Group Holdings, analysts believe Ideal Power is more attractive than Thermon Group Holdings.

Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.376%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thermon Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are larger than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $550. Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $9.5M is higher than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Thermon Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.36x while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thermon Group Holdings is 1.97x versus 395.40x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 8.28% compared to Thermon Group Holdings's net margin of -121.55%. Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.34% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -45.97%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.29%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.01 which suggests that it could grow by 14.75%. Given that Thermon Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Thermon Group Holdings is more attractive than Plug Power.

Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.272%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thermon Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $173.7M. Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $9.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$211.2M. Notably, Thermon Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.36x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thermon Group Holdings is 1.97x versus 2.56x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of 8.28% compared to Thermon Group Holdings's net margin of 0.72%. Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.34% beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.29%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.04%. Given that Ultralife has higher upside potential than Thermon Group Holdings, analysts believe Ultralife is more attractive than Thermon Group Holdings.

Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.274%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thermon Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are larger than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $9.5M is higher than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Thermon Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.36x while Ultralife's PE ratio is 13.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thermon Group Holdings is 1.97x versus 0.73x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vertiv Holdings has a net margin of 8.28% compared to Thermon Group Holdings's net margin of 8.52%. Thermon Group Holdings's return on equity of 9.34% beat Vertiv Holdings's return on equity of 34.31%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.29%. On the other hand Vertiv Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $140.16 which suggests that it could grow by 21.76%. Given that Thermon Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Vertiv Holdings, analysts believe Thermon Group Holdings is more attractive than Vertiv Holdings.

Thermon Group Holdings has a beta of 1.098, which suggesting that the stock is 9.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vertiv Holdings has a beta of 1.608, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.825%.

Thermon Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vertiv Holdings offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Thermon Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings pays out 2.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Vertiv Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thermon Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $114.6M, which are smaller than Vertiv Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Thermon Group Holdings's net income of $9.5M is lower than Vertiv Holdings's net income of $176.6M. Notably, Thermon Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.36x while Vertiv Holdings's PE ratio is 76.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thermon Group Holdings is 1.97x versus 5.89x for Vertiv Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.