SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 27.16% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 26.38%. S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21% beat FactSet Research Systems's return on equity of 28.97%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $580.91, signalling upside risk potential of 18.12%. On the other hand FactSet Research Systems has an analysts' consensus of $471.11 which suggests that it could fall by -2.57%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than FactSet Research Systems, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than FactSet Research Systems.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.653%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. FactSet Research Systems offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. S&P Global pays 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than FactSet Research Systems quarterly revenues of $568.7M. S&P Global's net income of $971M is higher than FactSet Research Systems's net income of $150M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.41x while FactSet Research Systems's PE ratio is 34.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.20x versus 8.37x for FactSet Research Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 27.16% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 29.45%. S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21% beat Moodys's return on equity of 53.93%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $580.91, signalling upside risk potential of 18.12%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $503.31 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Moodys.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.963%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. S&P Global pays 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 35.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.8B. S&P Global's net income of $971M is higher than Moodys's net income of $534M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.41x while Moodys's PE ratio is 42.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.20x versus 12.39x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSCI has a net margin of 27.16% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 38.76%. S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21% beat MSCI's return on equity of --.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $580.91, signalling upside risk potential of 18.12%. On the other hand MSCI has an analysts' consensus of $656.64 which suggests that it could grow by 8.57%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than MSCI.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSCI has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.277%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. MSCI offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share. S&P Global pays 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. MSCI pays out 38.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than MSCI quarterly revenues of $724.7M. S&P Global's net income of $971M is higher than MSCI's net income of $280.9M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.41x while MSCI's PE ratio is 39.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.20x versus 17.10x for MSCI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 27.16% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 16.09%. S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $580.91, signalling upside risk potential of 18.12%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Nasdaq.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, which suggesting that the stock is 19.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.74%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. S&P Global pays 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $1.9B. S&P Global's net income of $971M is higher than Nasdaq's net income of $306M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.41x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 46.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.20x versus 6.34x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.