MSCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Moodys has a net margin of 38.76% compared to MSCI's net margin of 29.45%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Moodys's return on equity of 53.93%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $656.64, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $503.31 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Moodys.

MSCI has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.963%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. MSCI pays 38.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 35.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $724.7M, which are smaller than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MSCI's net income of $280.9M is lower than Moodys's net income of $534M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while Moodys's PE ratio is 42.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 17.10x versus 12.39x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 38.76% compared to MSCI's net margin of 21.02%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Morningstar's return on equity of 23.47%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $656.64, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.256%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. MSCI pays 38.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 45.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $724.7M, which are larger than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $569.4M. MSCI's net income of $280.9M is higher than Morningstar's net income of $119.7M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 44.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 17.10x versus 6.60x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 38.76% compared to MSCI's net margin of 16.09%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $656.64, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Nasdaq.

MSCI has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MSCI pays 38.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $724.7M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSCI's net income of $280.9M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $306M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 46.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 17.10x versus 6.34x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 38.76% compared to MSCI's net margin of 27.16%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $656.64, signalling upside risk potential of 8.57%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $580.91 which suggests that it could grow by 18.12%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.149%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. MSCI pays 38.39% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $724.7M, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. MSCI's net income of $280.9M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $971M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 43.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 17.10x versus 11.20x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.