RYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries has a net margin of -0.59% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 3.45%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.83%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.448%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Ryerson Holding pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M is lower than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 35.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.14x versus 0.64x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of -0.59% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 26.12%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.83%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.809%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $137.5M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M is lower than L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.14x versus 0.54x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial has a net margin of -0.59% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 4.91%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.83%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.73%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.864, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.56%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ryerson Holding pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $342.4M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.14x versus 0.72x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of -0.59% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 4.85%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43% beat Transcat's return on equity of 8.06%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.83%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $123.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.55%. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than Transcat.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.356% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.767%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding pays 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M is lower than Transcat's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Transcat's PE ratio is 52.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.14x versus 3.53x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.