GIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 3.45%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.448%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global Industrial pays 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 35.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.72x versus 0.64x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 26.12%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.809%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $137.5M. Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M is lower than L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.72x versus 0.54x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -0.59%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.83%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.356%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Global Industrial pays 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.72x versus 0.14x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 4.85%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02% beat Transcat's return on equity of 8.06%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 58.73%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $123.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.55%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Transcat.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.767%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $342.4M, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M is higher than Transcat's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.82x while Transcat's PE ratio is 52.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.72x versus 3.53x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.