POST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 32.41%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.70, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $33.04 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that Post Holdings has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Post Holdings is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.734%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.40x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.93x versus 1.42x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of -3.43%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.70, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Laird Superfood has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 176.01%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Laird Superfood quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is higher than Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.40x while Laird Superfood's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.93x versus 1.08x for Laird Superfood. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of -2.26%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.70, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.86 which suggests that it could grow by 41.55%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.375%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.40x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 19.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.93x versus 1.11x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Simply Good Foods has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Post Holdings's net margin of 11.17%. Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85% beat The Simply Good Foods's return on equity of 8.39%.

Post Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.70, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand The Simply Good Foods has an analysts' consensus of $40.90 which suggests that it could grow by 19.35%. Given that The Simply Good Foods has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe The Simply Good Foods is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Post Holdings has a beta of 0.652, which suggesting that the stock is 34.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Simply Good Foods has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.644%.

Post Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Simply Good Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Simply Good Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than The Simply Good Foods quarterly revenues of $341.3M. Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M is higher than The Simply Good Foods's net income of $38.1M. Notably, Post Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.40x while The Simply Good Foods's PE ratio is 24.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings is 0.93x versus 2.55x for The Simply Good Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.