Financhill
Sell
49

LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$5.45
Seasonality move :
108.44%
Day range:
$4.75 - $5.61
52-week range:
$1.90 - $10.90
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.23x
P/B ratio:
4.17x
Volume:
98K
Avg. volume:
85.2K
1-year change:
123.43%
Market cap:
$55M
Revenue:
$43.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.19

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LSF
Laird Superfood
$11.7M -- 14.43% -- $13.00
ACU
Acme United
$42.1M -- 0.32% -- $58.00
CDXC
ChromaDex
$26.5M $0.02 22.22% -53.33% $8.82
KHC
The Kraft Heinz
$6.7B $0.78 -5.55% -6.97% $33.04
LFVN
Lifevantage
$67.4M $0.13 26.42% 25.64% $32.50
POST
Post Holdings
$2B $1.51 -0.95% -22.08% $128.70
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LSF
Laird Superfood
$5.34 $13.00 $55M -- $0.00 0% 1.23x
ACU
Acme United
$40.85 $58.00 $153.4M 16.81x $0.15 1.47% 0.87x
CDXC
ChromaDex
$7.84 $8.82 $609.6M 78.56x $0.00 0% 6.11x
KHC
The Kraft Heinz
$30.23 $33.04 $36.1B 13.38x $0.40 5.29% 1.42x
LFVN
Lifevantage
$17.07 $32.50 $214.3M 30.48x $0.04 0.94% 1.04x
POST
Post Holdings
$111.67 $128.70 $6.3B 18.40x $0.00 0% 0.93x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LSF
Laird Superfood
-- 9.326 -- 1.71x
ACU
Acme United
20.69% 1.078 19.91% 1.51x
CDXC
ChromaDex
-- 7.809 -- 2.91x
KHC
The Kraft Heinz
28.77% -0.618 53.94% 0.48x
LFVN
Lifevantage
-- 1.407 -- 0.86x
POST
Post Holdings
64.12% 0.539 104.13% 1.51x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LSF
Laird Superfood
$4.5M -$477.3K -14.01% -14.01% -4.11% $339.2K
ACU
Acme United
$17.8M $2.3M 7.49% 9.74% 5.05% $4.7M
CDXC
ChromaDex
$18.2M $7.1M 25.36% 25.36% 24.42% $8.5M
KHC
The Kraft Heinz
$2.2B $1.4B 3.96% 5.57% -0.17% $1.1B
LFVN
Lifevantage
$54.6M $3.4M 26.66% 26.66% 5.06% $8.7M
POST
Post Holdings
$595.3M $214.1M 3.71% 9.85% 11.62% $171.4M

Laird Superfood vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LSF or ACU?

    Acme United has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 3.72%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Acme United's return on equity of 9.74%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    38.62% -$0.04 $13.2M
    ACU
    Acme United
    38.67% $0.41 $134.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About LSF or ACU?

    Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.45%. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.98%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Acme United, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Acme United.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1 0 0
    ACU
    Acme United
    1 0 0
  • Is LSF or ACU More Risky?

    Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.072%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LSF or ACU?

    Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 22.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LSF or ACU?

    Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Acme United quarterly revenues of $45.9M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Acme United's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acme United's PE ratio is 16.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.23x versus 0.87x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1.23x -- $11.6M -$398.4K
    ACU
    Acme United
    0.87x 16.81x $45.9M $1.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns LSF or CDXC?

    ChromaDex has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 24.65%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat ChromaDex's return on equity of 25.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    38.62% -$0.04 $13.2M
    CDXC
    ChromaDex
    62.48% $0.09 $46.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About LSF or CDXC?

    Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.45%. On the other hand ChromaDex has an analysts' consensus of $8.82 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than ChromaDex, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than ChromaDex.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1 0 0
    CDXC
    ChromaDex
    3 0 0
  • Is LSF or CDXC More Risky?

    Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChromaDex has a beta of 2.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.863%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LSF or CDXC?

    Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChromaDex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChromaDex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LSF or CDXC?

    Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than ChromaDex quarterly revenues of $29.1M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than ChromaDex's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ChromaDex's PE ratio is 78.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.23x versus 6.11x for ChromaDex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1.23x -- $11.6M -$398.4K
    CDXC
    ChromaDex
    6.11x 78.56x $29.1M $7.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns LSF or KHC?

    The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 32.41%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    38.62% -$0.04 $13.2M
    KHC
    The Kraft Heinz
    34.14% $1.76 $69.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About LSF or KHC?

    Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.45%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $33.04 which suggests that it could grow by 9.31%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1 0 0
    KHC
    The Kraft Heinz
    3 16 0
  • Is LSF or KHC More Risky?

    Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.734%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LSF or KHC?

    Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LSF or KHC?

    Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.23x versus 1.42x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1.23x -- $11.6M -$398.4K
    KHC
    The Kraft Heinz
    1.42x 13.38x $6.6B $2.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns LSF or LFVN?

    Lifevantage has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 3.76%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    38.62% -$0.04 $13.2M
    LFVN
    Lifevantage
    80.53% $0.19 $29.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About LSF or LFVN?

    Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.45%. On the other hand Lifevantage has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 90.39%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Lifevantage, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Lifevantage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1 0 0
    LFVN
    Lifevantage
    2 0 0
  • Is LSF or LFVN More Risky?

    Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifevantage has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.934%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LSF or LFVN?

    Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifevantage offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifevantage pays out 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LSF or LFVN?

    Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Lifevantage quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lifevantage's PE ratio is 30.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.23x versus 1.04x for Lifevantage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1.23x -- $11.6M -$398.4K
    LFVN
    Lifevantage
    1.04x 30.48x $67.8M $2.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns LSF or POST?

    Post Holdings has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 5.74%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    38.62% -$0.04 $13.2M
    POST
    Post Holdings
    30.15% $1.78 $10.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About LSF or POST?

    Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 143.45%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.70 which suggests that it could grow by 15.25%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1 0 0
    POST
    Post Holdings
    4 3 0
  • Is LSF or POST More Risky?

    Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.835%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LSF or POST?

    Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LSF or POST?

    Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.23x versus 0.93x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LSF
    Laird Superfood
    1.23x -- $11.6M -$398.4K
    POST
    Post Holdings
    0.93x 18.40x $2B $113.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?
Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?

Chip giant QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) was the ultimate chip company…

What Is Buffett Buying and Selling Now?
What Is Buffett Buying and Selling Now?

In Q4 of last year, Warren Buffett made a few…

3 Safest Stocks to Buy Now
3 Safest Stocks to Buy Now

With the S&P 500 now in correction and stocks selling…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
59
GRRR alert for Mar 15

Gorilla Technology Group [GRRR] is up 29.72% over the past day.

Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 15

Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 17.38% over the past day.

Sell
50
NUTX alert for Mar 15

Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 14.56% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock