LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -3.59%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat Bridgford Foods's return on equity of -0.79%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.88%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Bridgford Foods.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods has a beta of -0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.691%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods quarterly revenues of $49.3M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is higher than Bridgford Foods's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods's PE ratio is 24.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.85x versus 0.41x for Bridgford Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Better Choice has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 13.42%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.88%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 362.96%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.081%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.85x versus 0.07x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -4.98%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat The Hain Celestial Group's return on equity of -8.73%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.88%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.79 which suggests that it could grow by 50.84%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group has a beta of 0.714, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.557%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hain Celestial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group quarterly revenues of $394.6M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is higher than The Hain Celestial Group's net income of -$19.7M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Hain Celestial Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.85x versus 0.34x for The Hain Celestial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness has a net margin of -1.41% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -14.58%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -9.88% beat Healthy Choice Wellness's return on equity of -80.93%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.88%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Healthy Choice Wellness, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Healthy Choice Wellness.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.8M, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness quarterly revenues of $18.2M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$166.1K is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.85x versus 0.11x for Healthy Choice Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.