PFGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 2.86%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 9.49% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of 4.71%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.74%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.07%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than Performance Food Group, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than Performance Food Group.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.412, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.755%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -829.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.6B, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $154.4M. Performance Food Group's net income of $42.4M is higher than Calavo Growers's net income of $4.4M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is 45.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.20x versus 0.64x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.05%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 9.49% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 3.29%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.74%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.361%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.6B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $711.3M. Performance Food Group's net income of $42.4M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $348.4K. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.20x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 2.02%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 9.49% beat Sysco's return on equity of 90.07%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.74%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $83.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.6%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.424%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.6B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.2B. Performance Food Group's net income of $42.4M is lower than Sysco's net income of $406M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while Sysco's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.20x versus 0.44x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 0.27% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.7%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 9.49% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.74%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $79.48 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.285% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.293%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.6B, which are larger than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Performance Food Group's net income of $42.4M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.77x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 31.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.20x versus 0.41x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.