CVGW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -0.41% compared to Calavo Growers's net margin of 1.51%. Calavo Growers's return on equity of -4.23% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 10.43%.

Calavo Growers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $53.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.83%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than The Chefs' Warehouse, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than The Chefs' Warehouse.

Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.583, which suggesting that the stock is 41.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.995%.

Calavo Growers has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calavo Growers pays -125.04% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Calavo Growers quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $931.5M. Calavo Growers's net income of -$732K is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $14.1M. Notably, Calavo Growers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 42.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calavo Growers is 0.45x versus 0.64x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -0.41% compared to Calavo Growers's net margin of 0.17%. Calavo Growers's return on equity of -4.23% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

Calavo Growers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.583, which suggesting that the stock is 41.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.577%.

Calavo Growers has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Calavo Growers pays -125.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calavo Growers quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Calavo Growers's net income of -$732K is lower than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Calavo Growers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calavo Growers is 0.45x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HF Foods Group has a net margin of -0.41% compared to Calavo Growers's net margin of -1.32%. Calavo Growers's return on equity of -4.23% beat HF Foods Group's return on equity of -0.66%.

Calavo Growers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand HF Foods Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.91%. Given that HF Foods Group has higher upside potential than Calavo Growers, analysts believe HF Foods Group is more attractive than Calavo Growers.

Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.583, which suggesting that the stock is 41.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Foods Group has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.999%.

Calavo Growers has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. HF Foods Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calavo Growers pays -125.04% of its earnings as a dividend. HF Foods Group pays out -40.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Calavo Growers quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than HF Foods Group quarterly revenues of $298.4M. Calavo Growers's net income of -$732K is higher than HF Foods Group's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Calavo Growers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HF Foods Group's PE ratio is 43.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calavo Growers is 0.45x versus 0.15x for HF Foods Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of -0.41% compared to Calavo Growers's net margin of 0.49%. Calavo Growers's return on equity of -4.23% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86%.

Calavo Growers has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.45%. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.44%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than SpartanNash, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than SpartanNash.

Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.583, which suggesting that the stock is 41.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.539%.

Calavo Growers has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Calavo Growers pays -125.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Calavo Growers quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Calavo Growers's net income of -$732K is lower than SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Calavo Growers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calavo Growers is 0.45x versus 0.07x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.