Financhill
Buy
55

NPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$177.69
Seasonality move :
7.18%
Day range:
$177.21 - $179.47
52-week range:
$136.68 - $197.94
Dividend yield:
0.67%
P/E ratio:
69.78x
P/S ratio:
3.64x
P/B ratio:
2.58x
Volume:
83K
Avg. volume:
95K
1-year change:
15.47%
Market cap:
$3.8B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.57

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NPO
Enpro
$250.1M $1.47 0.4% 380.34% $216.67
ACTG
Acacia Research
$47.8M -$0.07 -48.27% -100% --
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -- -- -- --
HI
Hillenbrand
$695.5M $0.54 -10.07% 123.33% $59.00
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$405.9M $0.62 4.25% 1.14% --
SYM
Symbotic
$490M $0.03 36.22% -- $34.94
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NPO
Enpro
$179.34 $216.67 $3.8B 69.78x $0.30 0.67% 3.64x
ACTG
Acacia Research
$4.35 -- $423.6M 8.24x $0.00 0% 2.62x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$15.65 -- $15.1M -- $0.03 2.11% 0.51x
HI
Hillenbrand
$35.03 $59.00 $2.5B 34.24x $0.23 2.55% 0.78x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$24.70 -- $346.8M 19.76x $0.13 2.02% 0.19x
SYM
Symbotic
$31.38 $34.94 $3.3B -- $0.00 0% 1.68x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NPO
Enpro
30.57% 2.496 18.85% 1.81x
ACTG
Acacia Research
11.47% 1.459 14.03% 15.10x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -0.163 -- 2.68x
HI
Hillenbrand
57.09% 1.213 95.28% 0.72x
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
66.32% 1.938 149.94% 0.93x
SYM
Symbotic
-- 0.726 -- 1.13x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NPO
Enpro
$110.3M $34.1M 2.59% 3.78% 13.19% $47.3M
ACTG
Acacia Research
$2.4M -$10.3M 8.59% 9.12% -26.43% -$7.8M
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$695K -$823.6K -13.89% -13.89% -11.82% -$368.9K
HI
Hillenbrand
$288.4M $68.4M -5.83% -13.25% 12.46% $153.4M
PKOH
Park-Ohio Holdings
$72.3M $24.5M 1.73% 5.53% 5.92% -$100K
SYM
Symbotic
$96.4M $10.9M -4.99% -4.99% 1.93% -$120.8M

Enpro vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NPO or ACTG?

    Acacia Research has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of -60.04%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Acacia Research's return on equity of 9.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NPO
    Enpro
    42.28% $0.94 $2.1B
    ACTG
    Acacia Research
    10.09% -$0.14 $648.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About NPO or ACTG?

    Enpro has a consensus price target of $216.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Acacia Research has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60.92%. Given that Acacia Research has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Acacia Research is more attractive than Enpro.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NPO
    Enpro
    3 0 0
    ACTG
    Acacia Research
    0 0 0
  • Is NPO or ACTG More Risky?

    Enpro has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acacia Research has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.936%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NPO or ACTG?

    Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Acacia Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research pays out 2.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Acacia Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Enpro's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NPO or ACTG?

    Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are larger than Acacia Research quarterly revenues of $23.3M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Acacia Research's net income of -$14M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.78x while Acacia Research's PE ratio is 8.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.64x versus 2.62x for Acacia Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NPO
    Enpro
    3.64x 69.78x $260.9M $19.8M
    ACTG
    Acacia Research
    2.62x 8.24x $23.3M -$14M
  • Which has Higher Returns NPO or CVR?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of -20.76%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NPO
    Enpro
    42.28% $0.94 $2.1B
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About NPO or CVR?

    Enpro has a consensus price target of $216.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NPO
    Enpro
    3 0 0
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
  • Is NPO or CVR More Risky?

    Enpro has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NPO or CVR?

    Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NPO or CVR?

    Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.78x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.64x versus 0.51x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NPO
    Enpro
    3.64x 69.78x $260.9M $19.8M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.51x -- $7M -$1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns NPO or HI?

    Hillenbrand has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of 1.74%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NPO
    Enpro
    42.28% $0.94 $2.1B
    HI
    Hillenbrand
    34.43% $0.21 $3.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About NPO or HI?

    Enpro has a consensus price target of $216.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.47%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Enpro, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Enpro.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NPO
    Enpro
    3 0 0
    HI
    Hillenbrand
    3 0 0
  • Is NPO or HI More Risky?

    Enpro has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.487%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NPO or HI?

    Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NPO or HI?

    Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $837.6M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.78x while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.64x versus 0.78x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NPO
    Enpro
    3.64x 69.78x $260.9M $19.8M
    HI
    Hillenbrand
    0.78x 34.24x $837.6M $14.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns NPO or PKOH?

    Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of 2.35%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NPO
    Enpro
    42.28% $0.94 $2.1B
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    17.31% $0.73 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About NPO or PKOH?

    Enpro has a consensus price target of $216.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -37.25%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NPO
    Enpro
    3 0 0
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    0 1 0
  • Is NPO or PKOH More Risky?

    Enpro has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.49%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NPO or PKOH?

    Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Enpro's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NPO or PKOH?

    Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.78x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 19.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.64x versus 0.19x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NPO
    Enpro
    3.64x 69.78x $260.9M $19.8M
    PKOH
    Park-Ohio Holdings
    0.19x 19.76x $417.6M $9.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns NPO or SYM?

    Symbotic has a net margin of 7.59% compared to Enpro's net margin of 0.5%. Enpro's return on equity of 3.78% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NPO
    Enpro
    42.28% $0.94 $2.1B
    SYM
    Symbotic
    17.08% $0.05 $390.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About NPO or SYM?

    Enpro has a consensus price target of $216.67, signalling upside risk potential of 20.81%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $34.94 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that Enpro has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Enpro is more attractive than Symbotic.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NPO
    Enpro
    3 0 0
    SYM
    Symbotic
    9 6 1
  • Is NPO or SYM More Risky?

    Enpro has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.319% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NPO or SYM?

    Enpro has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enpro pays 109.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NPO or SYM?

    Enpro quarterly revenues are $260.9M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Enpro's net income of $19.8M is higher than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Enpro's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.78x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enpro is 3.64x versus 1.68x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NPO
    Enpro
    3.64x 69.78x $260.9M $19.8M
    SYM
    Symbotic
    1.68x -- $564.6M $2.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Intuitive Machines on Sale?
Is Intuitive Machines on Sale?

In 2024, Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) hit an out-of-this-world milestone when…

Can Charles Schwab Stock Double?
Can Charles Schwab Stock Double?

Charles Schwab (NYSE:SCHW) needs no introduction as a goliath in…

Why Did Stanley Druckenmiller Buy Teva Stock?
Why Did Stanley Druckenmiller Buy Teva Stock?

Billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller has been shaking up his portfolio lately,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 120x

Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Buy
75
EXOD alert for Jan 27

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 20.65% over the past day.

Buy
61
TWLO alert for Jan 27

Twilio [TWLO] is up 2.02% over the past day.

Buy
75
HZO alert for Jan 27

MarineMax [HZO] is down 0.88% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock