PKOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 2.35% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of -20.76%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.4%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $417.6M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.51x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of 2.35% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 12.78%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.4%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.81%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.742%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 4.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $417.6M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $99.4M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 37.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.90x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of 2.35% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.4%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 451.379%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $417.6M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.19x versus 0.05x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 2.35% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 0.5%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.4%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.80 which suggests that it could grow by 34.5%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $417.6M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M is higher than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.19x versus 1.35x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.