LOAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of -0.19%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $94.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $194.16 which suggests that it could grow by 9.11%. Given that Boeing has higher upside potential than Loar Holdings, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Loar Holdings.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.789%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 394.57x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 21.87x versus 1.75x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 8.13%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $94.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $291.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.05%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than Loar Holdings, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than Loar Holdings.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 394.57x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 21.87x versus 1.54x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 19.91%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $94.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $221.91 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Loar Holdings, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Loar Holdings.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 394.57x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 21.87x versus 5.44x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 4.63%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $94.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.21%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $23.72 which suggests that it could fall by -6.25%. Given that Triumph Group has more downside risk than Loar Holdings, analysts believe Loar Holdings is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.942%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 394.57x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 21.87x versus 1.58x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.