KD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Kyndryl Holdings's net margin of -11.03%. Kyndryl Holdings's return on equity of -7.67% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 91.83%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Kyndryl Holdings, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Kyndryl Holdings.

Kyndryl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Kyndryl Holdings's net income of -$43M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.72x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Kyndryl Holdings's net margin of 3.13%. Kyndryl Holdings's return on equity of -7.67% beat Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Clearwater Analytics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.27 which suggests that it could grow by 14.98%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Kyndryl Holdings, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Kyndryl Holdings.

Kyndryl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues of $115.8M. Kyndryl Holdings's net income of -$43M is lower than Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clearwater Analytics Holdings's PE ratio is 3,573.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings is 0.52x versus 15.39x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Kyndryl Holdings's net margin of --. Kyndryl Holdings's return on equity of -7.67% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Kyndryl Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.35%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Kyndryl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Kyndryl Holdings's net income of -$43M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings is 0.52x versus 8.80x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -1.14% compared to Kyndryl Holdings's net margin of 19.78%. Kyndryl Holdings's return on equity of -7.67% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.27%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $43.90 which suggests that it could fall by -45.51%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Kyndryl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kyndryl Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kyndryl Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kyndryl Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. Kyndryl Holdings's net income of -$43M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, Kyndryl Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 402.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kyndryl Holdings is 0.52x versus 73.22x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.