Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
62
CWAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.10
Seasonality move
:
-11.46%
Day range:
$27.54 - $28.89
52-week range:
$15.62 - $35.71
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
3,573.65x
P/S ratio:
15.39x
P/B ratio:
15.63x
Volume:
3.8M
Avg. volume:
3.5M
1-year change:
45.69%
Market cap:
$6.3B
Revenue:
$368.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings
|
$113.4M | $0.11 | 21.62% | -- | $24.27 |
|
BMTX
BM Technologies
|
$13.6M | -$0.21 | 1.03% | -67.65% | $5.50 |
|
CTM
Castellum
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems
|
$1.2B | $2.70 | 4.62% | 65.48% | $258.74 |
|
GTLB
GitLab
|
$188.3M | $0.16 | 26.07% | -89.18% | $80.09 |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings
|
$3.7B | -$0.03 | -1.59% | -95.13% | $38.40 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings
|
$28.70 | $24.27 | $6.3B | 3,573.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.39x |
|
BMTX
BM Technologies
|
$4.80 | $5.50 | $58.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.98x |
|
CTM
Castellum
|
$0.60 | -- | $33.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.72x |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems
|
$248.26 | $258.74 | $14.1B | 32.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.12x |
|
GTLB
GitLab
|
$59.83 | $80.09 | $9.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.63x |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings
|
$34.51 | $38.40 | $8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.52x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings
|
10.36% | 1.471 | 0.83% | 4.48x |
|
BMTX
BM Technologies
|
-- | -0.148 | -- | 0.73x |
|
CTM
Castellum
|
45.93% | 1.844 | 104.08% | 1.02x |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems
|
0.71% | 2.244 | 0.22% | 4.40x |
|
GTLB
GitLab
|
-- | 1.467 | -- | 2.40x |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings
|
75.27% | 4.231 | 59.54% | 0.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings
|
$84.5M | $7.3M | 0.14% | 0.16% | 6.34% | $48.1M |
|
BMTX
BM Technologies
|
$7.7M | -$4M | -45.36% | -45.36% | -28.64% | -$1.2M |
|
CTM
Castellum
|
$5M | -$1.4M | -39.97% | -74.03% | -11.91% | $738.9K |
|
EPAM
EPAM Systems
|
$403.5M | $177M | 12.95% | 13.05% | 15.16% | $237M |
|
GTLB
GitLab
|
$173.9M | -$28.7M | -7.4% | -7.4% | -14.66% | -$178.1M |
|
KD
Kyndryl Holdings
|
$750M | $103M | -2.02% | -7.67% | 0.53% | $15M |
Clearwater Analytics Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or BMTX?
BM Technologies has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -35.48%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat BM Technologies's return on equity of -45.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings72.93% $0.02 $500.2M BMTXBM Technologies54.47% -$0.42 $21.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or BMTX?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.27, signalling upside risk potential of 14.98%. On the other hand BM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.5%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than BM Technologies, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than BM Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings7 3 0 BMTXBM Technologies1 1 0 -
Is CWAN or BMTX More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BM Technologies has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.159%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or BMTX?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or BMTX?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are larger than BM Technologies quarterly revenues of $14.1M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is higher than BM Technologies's net income of -$5M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,573.65x while BM Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.39x versus 0.98x for BM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings15.39x 3,573.65x $115.8M $3.6M BMTXBM Technologies0.98x -- $14.1M -$5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or CTM?
Castellum has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -11.03%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings72.93% $0.02 $500.2M CTMCastellum42.72% -$0.02 $22.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or CTM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.27, signalling upside risk potential of 14.98%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 91.83%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings7 3 0 CTMCastellum0 0 0 -
Is CWAN or CTM More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or CTM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or CTM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,573.65x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.39x versus 0.72x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings15.39x 3,573.65x $115.8M $3.6M CTMCastellum0.72x -- $11.6M -$1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or EPAM?
EPAM Systems has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 11.68%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 13.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings72.93% $0.02 $500.2M EPAMEPAM Systems34.56% $2.37 $3.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or EPAM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.27, signalling upside risk potential of 14.98%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $258.74 which suggests that it could grow by 4.22%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than EPAM Systems.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings7 3 0 EPAMEPAM Systems8 5 0 -
Is CWAN or EPAM More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.442%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or EPAM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or EPAM?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is lower than EPAM Systems's net income of $136.3M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,573.65x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 32.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.39x versus 3.12x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings15.39x 3,573.65x $115.8M $3.6M EPAMEPAM Systems3.12x 32.24x $1.2B $136.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or GTLB?
GitLab has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 15.08%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat GitLab's return on equity of -7.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings72.93% $0.02 $500.2M GTLBGitLab88.71% $0.18 $770.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or GTLB?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.27, signalling upside risk potential of 14.98%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $80.09 which suggests that it could grow by 33.86%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings7 3 0 GTLBGitLab18 3 0 -
Is CWAN or GTLB More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or GTLB?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or GTLB?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than GitLab quarterly revenues of $196M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is lower than GitLab's net income of $29.6M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,573.65x while GitLab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.39x versus 13.63x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings15.39x 3,573.65x $115.8M $3.6M GTLBGitLab13.63x -- $196M $29.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CWAN or KD?
Kyndryl Holdings has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -1.14%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat Kyndryl Holdings's return on equity of -7.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings72.93% $0.02 $500.2M KDKyndryl Holdings19.87% -$0.19 $4.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CWAN or KD?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.27, signalling upside risk potential of 14.98%. On the other hand Kyndryl Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.40 which suggests that it could grow by 11.27%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Kyndryl Holdings, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Kyndryl Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings7 3 0 KDKyndryl Holdings3 0 0 -
Is CWAN or KD More Risky?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyndryl Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWAN or KD?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kyndryl Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyndryl Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWAN or KD?
Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than Kyndryl Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is higher than Kyndryl Holdings's net income of -$43M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,573.65x while Kyndryl Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.39x versus 0.52x for Kyndryl Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings15.39x 3,573.65x $115.8M $3.6M KDKyndryl Holdings0.52x -- $3.8B -$43M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is down 0.37% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 7.53% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 6.19% over the past day.
