CWAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -26.62%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 36.56%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.49%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Castellum.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.80x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.07x versus 1.34x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enfusion has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 0.23%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Enfusion's return on equity of 3.17%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 36.56%. On the other hand Enfusion has an analysts' consensus of $10.93 which suggests that it could fall by -1.64%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Enfusion.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enfusion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enfusion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are larger than Enfusion quarterly revenues of $52.9M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Enfusion's net income of $121K. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.80x while Enfusion's PE ratio is 370.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.07x versus 6.59x for Enfusion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -11.26%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -8.61%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 36.56%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $21.41 which suggests that it could grow by 49.42%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are smaller than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $194.6M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$21.9M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.80x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.07x versus 5.98x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of --. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 36.56%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.32%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.80x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.07x versus 5.23x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.