IT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of 6.75%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 8.34%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $533.91, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 72.65%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.507%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $73.7M. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $5M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.55x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 36.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.72x versus 1.89x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of 6.51%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $533.91, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $170.67 which suggests that it could grow by 27.98%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.933%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.55x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 14.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.72x versus 1.09x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of 9.55%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $533.91, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.77 which suggests that it could grow by 12.22%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.55x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 406.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.72x versus 66.13x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 23.24% compared to Gartner's net margin of -30.09%. Gartner's return on equity of 140.26% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 7.63%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $533.91, signalling upside risk potential of 41.43%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $29.08 which suggests that it could grow by 39.49%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Gartner has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 25.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.226%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $221.5M. Gartner's net income of $398.6M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of -$66.7M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.55x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 122.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.72x versus 3.98x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.