GPOR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coterra Energy has a net margin of -95.93% compared to Gulfport Energy's net margin of 21.29%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of -12.51% beat Coterra Energy's return on equity of 8.58%.

Gulfport Energy has a consensus price target of $219.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.1%. On the other hand Coterra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $34.20 which suggests that it could grow by 35.62%. Given that Coterra Energy has higher upside potential than Gulfport Energy, analysts believe Coterra Energy is more attractive than Gulfport Energy.

Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.107%.

Gulfport Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coterra Energy offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Gulfport Energy pays -1.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy pays out 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues are $284.8M, which are smaller than Coterra Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Gulfport Energy's net income of -$273.2M is lower than Coterra Energy's net income of $297M. Notably, Gulfport Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.99x while Coterra Energy's PE ratio is 16.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulfport Energy is 3.25x versus 3.45x for Coterra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of -95.93% compared to Gulfport Energy's net margin of -9%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of -12.51% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 2.16%.

Gulfport Energy has a consensus price target of $219.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.1%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $7.38 which suggests that it could grow by 73.94%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Gulfport Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Gulfport Energy.

Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.152%.

Gulfport Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 11.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Gulfport Energy pays -1.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues are $284.8M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Gulfport Energy's net income of -$273.2M is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Gulfport Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.99x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 84.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulfport Energy is 3.25x versus 1.61x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PrimeEnergy Resources has a net margin of -95.93% compared to Gulfport Energy's net margin of 33.12%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of -12.51% beat PrimeEnergy Resources's return on equity of 33.66%.

Gulfport Energy has a consensus price target of $219.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.1%. On the other hand PrimeEnergy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gulfport Energy has higher upside potential than PrimeEnergy Resources, analysts believe Gulfport Energy is more attractive than PrimeEnergy Resources.

Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.039, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.073%.

Gulfport Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PrimeEnergy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gulfport Energy pays -1.62% of its earnings as a dividend. PrimeEnergy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues are $284.8M, which are larger than PrimeEnergy Resources quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Gulfport Energy's net income of -$273.2M is lower than PrimeEnergy Resources's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Gulfport Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.99x while PrimeEnergy Resources's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulfport Energy is 3.25x versus 2.23x for PrimeEnergy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of -95.93% compared to Gulfport Energy's net margin of 14.22%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of -12.51% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92%.

Gulfport Energy has a consensus price target of $219.45, signalling upside risk potential of 32.1%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $40.48 which suggests that it could grow by 21.91%. Given that Gulfport Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Gulfport Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.162%.

Gulfport Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Gulfport Energy pays -1.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues are $284.8M, which are smaller than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $667M. Gulfport Energy's net income of -$273.2M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $94.8M. Notably, Gulfport Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.99x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 30.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gulfport Energy is 3.25x versus 3.46x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.