ENR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ATI has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 11.69%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 38.4% beat ATI's return on equity of 22.46%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.38, signalling upside risk potential of 22.78%. On the other hand ATI has an analysts' consensus of $74.44 which suggests that it could grow by 44.89%. Given that ATI has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe ATI is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATI has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.156%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. ATI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. ATI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $731.7M, which are smaller than ATI quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Energizer Holdings's net income of $22.3M is lower than ATI's net income of $137.1M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while ATI's PE ratio is 20.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.77x versus 1.73x for ATI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cummins has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 4.95%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 38.4% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.38, signalling upside risk potential of 22.78%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $389.74 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that Energizer Holdings has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Energizer Holdings is more attractive than Cummins.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.2%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energizer Holdings's is not.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $731.7M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Energizer Holdings's net income of $22.3M is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Cummins's PE ratio is 11.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.77x versus 1.33x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insteel Industries has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 0.83%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 38.4% beat Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.38, signalling upside risk potential of 22.78%. On the other hand Insteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.97%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.534%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Insteel Industries offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Insteel Industries pays out 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $731.7M, which are larger than Insteel Industries quarterly revenues of $129.7M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $22.3M is higher than Insteel Industries's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Insteel Industries's PE ratio is 27.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.77x versus 1.00x for Insteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northwest Pipe has a net margin of 3.05% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 8.44%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 38.4% beat Northwest Pipe's return on equity of 9.66%.

Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.38, signalling upside risk potential of 22.78%. On the other hand Northwest Pipe has an analysts' consensus of $57.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.23%. Given that Northwest Pipe has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Northwest Pipe is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.21% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northwest Pipe has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.257%.

Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.94%. Northwest Pipe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Pipe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $731.7M, which are larger than Northwest Pipe quarterly revenues of $119.6M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $22.3M is higher than Northwest Pipe's net income of $10.1M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.53x while Northwest Pipe's PE ratio is 12.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.77x versus 0.85x for Northwest Pipe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.