DINO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -1.05% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 1.77%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 3.23% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $169.53 which suggests that it could grow by 27.1%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.569%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. HF Sinclair pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $35.1B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$75.9M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.84x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 10.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.33x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of -1.05% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -3.41%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 3.23% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -4.5%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $30.31 which suggests that it could grow by 20.51%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than PBF Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.485%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. HF Sinclair pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 5.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $8.4B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$75.9M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$285.9M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.84x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.09x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -1.05% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 0.97%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 3.23% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 10.89%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $141.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.28%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Phillips 66.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.962%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. HF Sinclair pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $35.5B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$75.9M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $346M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.84x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 14.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -1.05% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 1.11%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of 3.23% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $49.23, signalling upside risk potential of 45.83%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.39 which suggests that it could grow by 25.97%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Valero Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.691% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.739%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.92%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. HF Sinclair pays 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $32.9B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$75.9M is lower than Valero Energy's net income of $364M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.84x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.22x versus 0.29x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.