CRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Carter's's net margin of -1.46%. Carter's's return on equity of 22.18% beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -21.57%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.34%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Duluth Holdings has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Duluth Holdings is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.665%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.45%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $859.7M, which are larger than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $241.3M. Carter's's net income of $61.5M is higher than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.60x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.42x versus 0.09x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Carter's's net margin of 15.24%. Carter's's return on equity of 22.18% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.34%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $54.60 which suggests that it could grow by 19.06%. Given that Etsy has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Etsy is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 2.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.351%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.45%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $859.7M, which are larger than Etsy quarterly revenues of $852.2M. Carter's's net income of $61.5M is lower than Etsy's net income of $129.9M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.60x while Etsy's PE ratio is 19.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.42x versus 2.15x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Carter's's net margin of 1.62%. Carter's's return on equity of 22.18% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.53%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.34%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 501.2%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.779%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.45%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 16.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $859.7M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Carter's's net income of $61.5M is higher than Natural Health Trends's net income of $176K. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.60x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 79.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.42x versus 1.33x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Carter's's net margin of 5.17%. Carter's's return on equity of 22.18% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.34%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $55.31 which suggests that it could grow by 10.79%. Given that Tractor Supply has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Tractor Supply is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 1.090, which suggesting that the stock is 9.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.09%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.45%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $859.7M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Carter's's net income of $61.5M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.60x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 24.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.42x versus 1.79x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.