CLDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 55.75%. Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity of 0.52% beat Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.46%. On the other hand Gaming and Leisure Properties has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.6%. Given that Chatham Lodging Trust has higher upside potential than Gaming and Leisure Properties, analysts believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more attractive than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.703%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Gaming and Leisure Properties offers a yield of 6.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Chatham Lodging Trust pays 535.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chatham Lodging Trust quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues of $389.6M. Chatham Lodging Trust's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Chatham Lodging Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gaming and Leisure Properties's PE ratio is 16.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chatham Lodging Trust is 1.03x versus 8.65x for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 70.33%. Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity of 0.52% beat Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.46%. On the other hand Manhattan Bridge Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.72%. Given that Chatham Lodging Trust has higher upside potential than Manhattan Bridge Capital, analysts believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more attractive than Manhattan Bridge Capital.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.032%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Manhattan Bridge Capital offers a yield of 8.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Chatham Lodging Trust pays 535.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays out 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chatham Lodging Trust's is not.

Chatham Lodging Trust quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are larger than Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Chatham Lodging Trust's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Chatham Lodging Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Manhattan Bridge Capital's PE ratio is 10.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chatham Lodging Trust is 1.03x versus 7.95x for Manhattan Bridge Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Redfin has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of -14.89%. Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity of 0.52% beat Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.46%. On the other hand Redfin has an analysts' consensus of $10.58 which suggests that it could grow by 19.55%. Given that Chatham Lodging Trust has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more attractive than Redfin.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Redfin has a beta of 2.565, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.49%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Redfin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chatham Lodging Trust pays 535.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Redfin pays out -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend.

Chatham Lodging Trust quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than Redfin quarterly revenues of $244.3M. Chatham Lodging Trust's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Redfin's net income of -$36.4M. Notably, Chatham Lodging Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Redfin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chatham Lodging Trust is 1.03x versus 1.03x for Redfin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of -2.27% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 25.03%. Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity of 0.52% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus price target of $10.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.46%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $249.41 which suggests that it could grow by 10.98%. Given that Chatham Lodging Trust has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 49.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.905%.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Chatham Lodging Trust pays 535.96% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chatham Lodging Trust's is not.

Chatham Lodging Trust quarterly revenues are $75.1M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $693.7M. Chatham Lodging Trust's net income of -$1.7M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M. Notably, Chatham Lodging Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 32.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chatham Lodging Trust is 1.03x versus 9.06x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.