SBAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Tower has a net margin of 25.03% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 48.27%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat American Tower's return on equity of 21.77%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $249.41, signalling upside risk potential of 12.3%. On the other hand American Tower has an analysts' consensus of $235.75 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than American Tower, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than American Tower.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Tower has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.139%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. American Tower offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. American Tower pays out 136.36% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but American Tower's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $693.7M, which are smaller than American Tower quarterly revenues of $2.5B. SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M is lower than American Tower's net income of $1.2B. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while American Tower's PE ratio is 43.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.96x versus 9.13x for American Tower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crown Castle has a net margin of 25.03% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of -289.15%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -83.96%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $249.41, signalling upside risk potential of 12.3%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $110.76 which suggests that it could grow by 10.56%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Crown Castle, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Crown Castle.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.892%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 6.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $693.7M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.6B. SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$4.8B. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.96x versus 6.64x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 25.03% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 4.74%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 3.96%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $249.41, signalling upside risk potential of 12.3%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $34.25 which suggests that it could grow by 38.05%. Given that Weyerhaeuser has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Weyerhaeuser is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.568%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 172.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Weyerhaeuser's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $693.7M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.7B. SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M is higher than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $81M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 45.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.96x versus 2.54x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 25.03% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of -0.24%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Xenia Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 1.24%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $249.41, signalling upside risk potential of 12.3%. On the other hand Xenia Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $12.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.02%. Given that Xenia Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Xenia Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.447%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Xenia Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Xenia Hotels & Resorts pays out 296.85% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Xenia Hotels & Resorts's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $693.7M, which are larger than Xenia Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $261.8M. SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M is higher than Xenia Hotels & Resorts's net income of -$638K. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while Xenia Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 70.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.96x versus 1.04x for Xenia Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.