CARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 4.46%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 29.67% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.08%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $82.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.93%. Given that Carrier Global has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe Carrier Global is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

Carrier Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.494%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carrier Global pays 45.96% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $472.9M. Carrier Global's net income of $447M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.93x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.34x versus 0.76x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 3.45%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 29.67% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $82.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carrier Global has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Carrier Global is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Carrier Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.448%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Carrier Global pays 45.96% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Carrier Global's net income of $447M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.93x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 35.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.34x versus 0.64x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 26.12%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 29.67% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $82.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that Carrier Global has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Carrier Global is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

Carrier Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.809%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carrier Global pays 45.96% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carrier Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $137.5M. Carrier Global's net income of $447M is higher than L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.93x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.34x versus 0.54x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watsco has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 7.92%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 29.67% beat Watsco's return on equity of 18.11%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $82.57, signalling upside risk potential of 20.56%. On the other hand Watsco has an analysts' consensus of $399.90 which suggests that it could fall by -0.72%. Given that Carrier Global has higher upside potential than Watsco, analysts believe Carrier Global is more attractive than Watsco.

Carrier Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watsco has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.935%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Watsco offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.70 per share. Carrier Global pays 45.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Watsco pays out 71.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Watsco quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Carrier Global's net income of $447M is higher than Watsco's net income of $171M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.93x while Watsco's PE ratio is 37.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.34x versus 2.42x for Watsco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.