BILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sprout Social has a net margin of 9.25% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of -13.46%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 2.05% beat Sprout Social's return on equity of -40.33%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.6%. On the other hand Sprout Social has an analysts' consensus of $32.08 which suggests that it could grow by 63.16%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Sprout Social, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Sprout Social.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprout Social has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.491%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sprout Social offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprout Social pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $362.6M, which are larger than Sprout Social quarterly revenues of $107.1M. BILL Holdings's net income of $33.5M is higher than Sprout Social's net income of -$14.4M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprout Social's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.22x versus 2.76x for Sprout Social. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 9.25% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 57.56%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 2.05% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.6%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $88.78 which suggests that it could grow by 22.83%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.765%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $362.6M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $12B. BILL Holdings's net income of $33.5M is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.22x versus 3.50x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 9.25% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 4.25%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 2.05% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.6%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $309.98 which suggests that it could grow by 36.85%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Workday.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $362.6M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BILL Holdings's net income of $33.5M is lower than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 115.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.22x versus 7.22x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Block has a net margin of 9.25% compared to BILL Holdings's net margin of 32.26%. BILL Holdings's return on equity of 2.05% beat Block's return on equity of 14.77%.

BILL Holdings has a consensus price target of $81.75, signalling upside risk potential of 96.6%. On the other hand Block has an analysts' consensus of $88.48 which suggests that it could grow by 64.03%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Block.

BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Block has a beta of 2.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.872%.

BILL Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Block offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BILL Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Block pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BILL Holdings quarterly revenues are $362.6M, which are smaller than Block quarterly revenues of $6B. BILL Holdings's net income of $33.5M is lower than Block's net income of $1.9B. Notably, BILL Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Block's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BILL Holdings is 3.22x versus 1.42x for Block. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.