AWI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TopBuild has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 11.47%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.4% beat TopBuild's return on equity of 26.04%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $164.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.52%. On the other hand TopBuild has an analysts' consensus of $383.91 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that TopBuild has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe TopBuild is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TopBuild has a beta of 1.886, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.63%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. TopBuild offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. TopBuild pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $367.7M, which are smaller than TopBuild quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $62.2M is lower than TopBuild's net income of $150.5M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.14x while TopBuild's PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.25x versus 1.76x for TopBuild. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Identiv has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of -5.3%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.4% beat Identiv's return on equity of 71.9%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $164.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.52%. On the other hand Identiv has an analysts' consensus of $6.83 which suggests that it could grow by 116.25%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Identiv has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.932%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Identiv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Identiv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $367.7M, which are larger than Identiv quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $62.2M is higher than Identiv's net income of -$355K. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.14x while Identiv's PE ratio is 1.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.25x versus 1.75x for Identiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of -0.54%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.4% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $164.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.52%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $104.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.8%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.979%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $367.7M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $561.6M. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $62.2M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.14x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 66.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.25x versus 1.89x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of 16.92% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of -1.56%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.4% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $164.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.52%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.23%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $367.7M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $62.2M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.14x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.25x versus 0.15x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.