ALSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of -23.71%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -16.73%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $99.10, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 400%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.1%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $163.3M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$38.7M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.51x versus 0.04x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 16.19%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.88%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $99.10, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $28.42 which suggests that it could grow by 33.05%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.567%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Gentex offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $541.6M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Gentex's net income of $87.7M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Gentex's PE ratio is 12.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.51x versus 2.10x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of --. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $99.10, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.51x versus 145.53x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 21.99% compared to Allison Transmission Holdings's net margin of 6.96%. Allison Transmission Holdings's return on equity of 49.86% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a consensus price target of $99.10, signalling upside risk potential of 7.96%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $91.77 which suggests that it could grow by 16.18%. Given that Visteon has higher upside potential than Allison Transmission Holdings, analysts believe Visteon is more attractive than Allison Transmission Holdings.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.858% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.364%.

Allison Transmission Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allison Transmission Holdings pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allison Transmission Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allison Transmission Holdings quarterly revenues are $796M, which are smaller than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. Allison Transmission Holdings's net income of $175M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, Allison Transmission Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Visteon's PE ratio is 7.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allison Transmission Holdings is 2.51x versus 0.57x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.