GNTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 16.19% compared to Gentex's net margin of --. Gentex's return on equity of 16.88% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Gentex has a consensus price target of $30.51, signalling upside risk potential of 43.17%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Gentex has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gentex has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentex pays 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentex quarterly revenues are $541.6M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Gentex's net income of $87.7M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Gentex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentex is 2.09x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of 16.19% compared to Gentex's net margin of 1.54%. Gentex's return on equity of 16.88% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Gentex has a consensus price target of $30.51, signalling upside risk potential of 43.17%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 22.12%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Gentex has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.854%.

Gentex has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentex pays 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentex quarterly revenues are $541.6M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Gentex's net income of $87.7M is higher than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Gentex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentex is 2.09x versus 0.14x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 16.19% compared to Gentex's net margin of -1.45%. Gentex's return on equity of 16.88% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity of 2.13%.

Gentex has a consensus price target of $30.51, signalling upside risk potential of 43.17%. On the other hand MillerKnoll has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 87.35%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Gentex, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Gentex.

Gentex has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.388%.

Gentex has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. MillerKnoll offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Gentex pays 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentex quarterly revenues are $541.6M, which are smaller than MillerKnoll quarterly revenues of $876.2M. Gentex's net income of $87.7M is higher than MillerKnoll's net income of -$12.7M. Notably, Gentex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while MillerKnoll's PE ratio is 38.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentex is 2.09x versus 0.32x for MillerKnoll. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 16.19% compared to Gentex's net margin of -46.97%. Gentex's return on equity of 16.88% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Gentex has a consensus price target of $30.51, signalling upside risk potential of 43.17%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 548.15%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Gentex, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Gentex.

Gentex has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.56%.

Gentex has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentex pays 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentex quarterly revenues are $541.6M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Gentex's net income of $87.7M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Gentex's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.11x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentex is 2.09x versus 1.28x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.