ALB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -5.3%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 32.79%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $14.40 which suggests that it could grow by 53.53%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.926, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.634%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.78x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 167.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.60x versus 0.23x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 4.35%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 3.06%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 32.79%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.77 which suggests that it could grow by 36.14%. Given that The Mosaic has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe The Mosaic is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.286%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.78x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 21.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.60x versus 0.68x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 3.36%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 32.79%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $163.96 which suggests that it could grow by 40.65%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.201%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.78x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.60x versus 0.90x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 7.32%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 32.79%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.558, which suggesting that the stock is 55.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.78x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.60x versus 1.03x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.