AGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of -189.45%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than CEA Industries.

AGCO has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.587%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.60x versus 2.24x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of 10.52%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $492.57 which suggests that it could grow by 4.26%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Deere &.

AGCO has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.365%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.60x versus 2.77x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of 10.32%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $138.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.73%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Lindsay.

AGCO has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.704, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.587%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $166.3M. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than Lindsay's net income of $17.2M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.60x versus 2.28x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of -8.86% compared to AGCO's net margin of 0.35%. AGCO's return on equity of -9.44% beat Titan International's return on equity of -0.99%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.94%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 43.35%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.002% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.099%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Titan International quarterly revenues of $383.6M. AGCO's net income of -$255.7M is lower than Titan International's net income of $1.3M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.60x versus 0.33x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.