LGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ESCO Technologies has a net margin of 11.08% compared to LGL Group's net margin of 9.5%. LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89% beat ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2%.

LGL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand ESCO Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $170.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.01%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.

LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.127%.

LGL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ESCO Technologies offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. LGL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies pays out 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LGL Group quarterly revenues are $650K, which are smaller than ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues of $247M. LGL Group's net income of $72K is lower than ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M. Notably, LGL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.24x while ESCO Technologies's PE ratio is 37.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LGL Group is 16.78x versus 3.87x for ESCO Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 11.08% compared to LGL Group's net margin of 1.09%. LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35%.

LGL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $41.50 which suggests that it could grow by 31.91%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than LGL Group.

LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.555, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.481%.

LGL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LGL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LGL Group quarterly revenues are $650K, which are smaller than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.9M. LGL Group's net income of $72K is lower than Faro Technologies's net income of $906K. Notably, LGL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.24x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LGL Group is 16.78x versus 1.78x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 11.08% compared to LGL Group's net margin of --. LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

LGL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than LGL Group.

LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

LGL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LGL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LGL Group quarterly revenues are $650K, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. LGL Group's net income of $72K is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, LGL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.24x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LGL Group is 16.78x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trimble has a net margin of 11.08% compared to LGL Group's net margin of 9.17%. LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89% beat Trimble's return on equity of 28.82%.

LGL Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.89%. On the other hand Trimble has an analysts' consensus of $82.15 which suggests that it could grow by 33.12%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than LGL Group.

LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trimble has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.272%.

LGL Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trimble offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LGL Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trimble pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LGL Group quarterly revenues are $650K, which are smaller than Trimble quarterly revenues of $983.4M. LGL Group's net income of $72K is lower than Trimble's net income of $90.2M. Notably, LGL Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 91.24x while Trimble's PE ratio is 10.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LGL Group is 16.78x versus 4.14x for Trimble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.