FARO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Itron has a net margin of -1.05% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 9.48%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51% beat Itron's return on equity of 17.69%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Itron.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.584% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.656%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $612.9M. Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K is lower than Itron's net income of $58.1M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Itron's PE ratio is 19.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.59x versus 1.95x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of -1.05% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 13.02%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.1%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $184.86 which suggests that it could grow by 23.29%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.584% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.732%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $169M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 42.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.59x versus 5.22x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of -1.05% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of --. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.584% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.59x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of -1.05% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of $38.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.66%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.41%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than LGL Group.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.584% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.324%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K is lower than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 115.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.59x versus 16.95x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.