VEEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Massimo Group has a net margin of -86.59% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats's net margin of -9.77%. Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03% beat Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1900%. On the other hand Massimo Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Massimo Group.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Massimo Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Vee PowerCats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Massimo Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Massimo Group quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Twin Vee PowerCats's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Massimo Group's PE ratio is 13.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Vee PowerCats is 0.18x versus 0.77x for Massimo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of -86.59% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats's net margin of 1.61%. Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03% beat Polaris's return on equity of 14.92%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1900%. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $78.79 which suggests that it could grow by 36.17%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Polaris.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.614%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polaris offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Twin Vee PowerCats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Polaris's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Twin Vee PowerCats's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polaris's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Vee PowerCats is 0.18x versus 0.43x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -86.59% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats's net margin of 8.61%. Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1900%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Tesla.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Vee PowerCats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Twin Vee PowerCats's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Vee PowerCats is 0.18x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vivic has a net margin of -86.59% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats's net margin of 16.52%. Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03% beat Vivic's return on equity of 185.07%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1900%. On the other hand Vivic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Vivic.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vivic has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.539%.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Twin Vee PowerCats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vivic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Vivic quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Vivic's net income of $425.2K. Notably, Twin Vee PowerCats's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vivic's PE ratio is 24.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Twin Vee PowerCats is 0.18x versus 11.84x for Vivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.