Financhill
Sell
32

MAMO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$2.51
Seasonality move :
--
Day range:
$2.44 - $2.67
52-week range:
$2.42 - $4.66
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
13.62x
P/S ratio:
0.77x
P/B ratio:
4.50x
Volume:
147.6K
Avg. volume:
169.8K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$101.4M
Revenue:
$115M
EPS (TTM):
$0.18

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
MAMO
Massimo Group
-- -- -- -- --
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
PII
Polaris
$1.8B $0.91 -26.5% -50.39% $78.79
TSLA
Tesla
$25.4B $0.60 8.83% -66.33% $283.88
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
-- -- -- -- --
VIVC
Vivic
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
MAMO
Massimo Group
$2.45 -- $101.4M 13.62x $0.00 0% 0.77x
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
$0.3180 -- $2.7M -- $0.00 0% --
PII
Polaris
$57.86 $78.79 $3.2B 16.16x $0.66 4.56% 0.43x
TSLA
Tesla
$421.06 $283.88 $1.4T 115.36x $0.00 0% 15.13x
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
$0.40 -- $3.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.18x
VIVC
Vivic
$2.65 -- $70.6M 24.09x $0.00 0% 11.84x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
MAMO
Massimo Group
22.22% 0.000 4.15% 0.51x
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
-- 0.105 -- --
PII
Polaris
61.91% 2.041 46.89% 0.25x
TSLA
Tesla
9.56% 1.482 0.88% 1.21x
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
2.79% -0.466 4.34% 2.93x
VIVC
Vivic
23.53% 10.409 0.67% 2.77x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
MAMO
Massimo Group
$7M $333.4K 27.44% 40.58% -11.95% $4.6M
LFEV
Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
-- -- -- -- -- --
PII
Polaris
$354.6M $66.1M 5.87% 14.92% 4.13% -$47.3M
TSLA
Tesla
$5B $2.8B 18.19% 19.77% 11.42% $2.7B
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
-$145.7K -$3M -33.46% -34.03% -101.78% -$3.7M
VIVC
Vivic
$825.6K $441.4K 118.91% 185.07% 16.19% $307.6K

Massimo Group vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns MAMO or LFEV?

    Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has a net margin of -9.77% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of --. Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58% beat Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    27.16% -$0.06 $29M
    LFEV
    Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About MAMO or LFEV?

    Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Massimo Group has higher upside potential than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings, analysts believe Massimo Group is more attractive than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0 0 0
    LFEV
    Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is MAMO or LFEV More Risky?

    Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has a beta of -15.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1668.53%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or LFEV?

    Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Electric Vehicles Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Electric Vehicles Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or LFEV?

    Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $25.6M, which are larger than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.62x while Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.77x versus -- for Life Electric Vehicles Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0.77x 13.62x $25.6M -$2.5M
    LFEV
    Life Electric Vehicles Holdings
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns MAMO or PII?

    Polaris has a net margin of -9.77% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 1.61%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58% beat Polaris's return on equity of 14.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    27.16% -$0.06 $29M
    PII
    Polaris
    20.59% $0.49 $3.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About MAMO or PII?

    Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $78.79 which suggests that it could grow by 36.17%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Massimo Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0 0 0
    PII
    Polaris
    5 11 0
  • Is MAMO or PII More Risky?

    Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.614%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or PII?

    Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polaris offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or PII?

    Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $25.6M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Polaris's net income of $27.7M. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.62x while Polaris's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.77x versus 0.43x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0.77x 13.62x $25.6M -$2.5M
    PII
    Polaris
    0.43x 16.16x $1.7B $27.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns MAMO or TSLA?

    Tesla has a net margin of -9.77% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 8.61%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    27.16% -$0.06 $29M
    TSLA
    Tesla
    19.84% $0.62 $78.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About MAMO or TSLA?

    Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Massimo Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0 0 0
    TSLA
    Tesla
    13 15 8
  • Is MAMO or TSLA More Risky?

    Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or TSLA?

    Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or TSLA?

    Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $25.6M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.62x while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.77x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0.77x 13.62x $25.6M -$2.5M
    TSLA
    Tesla
    15.13x 115.36x $25.2B $2.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns MAMO or VEEE?

    Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -9.77% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of -86.59%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    27.16% -$0.06 $29M
    VEEE
    Twin Vee PowerCats
    -5.02% -$0.26 $23.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About MAMO or VEEE?

    Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1900%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Massimo Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0 0 0
    VEEE
    Twin Vee PowerCats
    0 0 0
  • Is MAMO or VEEE More Risky?

    Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or VEEE?

    Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or VEEE?

    Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $25.6M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.62x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.77x versus 0.18x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0.77x 13.62x $25.6M -$2.5M
    VEEE
    Twin Vee PowerCats
    0.18x -- $2.9M -$2.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns MAMO or VIVC?

    Vivic has a net margin of -9.77% compared to Massimo Group's net margin of 16.52%. Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58% beat Vivic's return on equity of 185.07%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    27.16% -$0.06 $29M
    VIVC
    Vivic
    32.06% $0.02 $3.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About MAMO or VIVC?

    Massimo Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vivic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Massimo Group has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Massimo Group is more attractive than Vivic.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0 0 0
    VIVC
    Vivic
    0 0 0
  • Is MAMO or VIVC More Risky?

    Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vivic has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.539%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MAMO or VIVC?

    Massimo Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Massimo Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vivic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MAMO or VIVC?

    Massimo Group quarterly revenues are $25.6M, which are larger than Vivic quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Vivic's net income of $425.2K. Notably, Massimo Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.62x while Vivic's PE ratio is 24.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Massimo Group is 0.77x versus 11.84x for Vivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MAMO
    Massimo Group
    0.77x 13.62x $25.6M -$2.5M
    VIVC
    Vivic
    11.84x 24.09x $2.6M $425.2K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock