ULH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Landstar System has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 4.12%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 22.88% beat Landstar System's return on equity of 20.52%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.83%. On the other hand Landstar System has an analysts' consensus of $170.40 which suggests that it could fall by -2.25%. Given that Universal Logistics Holdings has more downside risk than Landstar System, analysts believe Landstar System is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.891, which suggesting that the stock is 10.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Landstar System has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.834%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Landstar System offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 11.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System pays out 44.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $426.8M, which are smaller than Landstar System quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $26.5M is lower than Landstar System's net income of $50M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while Landstar System's PE ratio is 29.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.29x for Landstar System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 1.58%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 22.88% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 4.43%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.83%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.18%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.891, which suggesting that the stock is 10.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.477%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 11.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 27.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $426.8M, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $237.4M. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $26.5M is higher than Marten Transport's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 37.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.27x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 20.99%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 22.88% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 29.65%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.83%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $196.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.14%. Given that Old Dominion Freight Line has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.891, which suggesting that the stock is 10.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.082000000000004%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 11.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 14.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $426.8M, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $26.5M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $308.6M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 31.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.68x versus 6.62x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPO has a net margin of 6.22% compared to Universal Logistics Holdings's net margin of 4.63%. Universal Logistics Holdings's return on equity of 22.88% beat XPO's return on equity of 26.68%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.83%. On the other hand XPO has an analysts' consensus of $150.49 which suggests that it could grow by 13.78%. Given that XPO has higher upside potential than Universal Logistics Holdings, analysts believe XPO is more attractive than Universal Logistics Holdings.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.891, which suggesting that the stock is 10.944% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPO has a beta of 2.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.119%.

Universal Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. XPO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Logistics Holdings pays 11.88% of its earnings as a dividend. XPO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Logistics Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are $426.8M, which are smaller than XPO quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Universal Logistics Holdings's net income of $26.5M is lower than XPO's net income of $95M. Notably, Universal Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.25x while XPO's PE ratio is 42.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Logistics Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.95x for XPO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.