UG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of -4.64%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of 3.42%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $82.90 which suggests that it could grow by 11.48%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.674%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. United-Guardian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.4B. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$156M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 132.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.57x versus 1.74x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edgewell Personal Care has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 1.7%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat Edgewell Personal Care's return on equity of 6.32%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Edgewell Personal Care has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.73%. Given that Edgewell Personal Care has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Edgewell Personal Care is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.286%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. Edgewell Personal Care offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Edgewell Personal Care pays out 31.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Edgewell Personal Care quarterly revenues of $517.6M. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is lower than Edgewell Personal Care's net income of $8.8M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Edgewell Personal Care's PE ratio is 17.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.57x versus 0.76x for Edgewell Personal Care. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 14.66%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 16.5%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $142.60 which suggests that it could grow by 11.39%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.595%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 52.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $424.6M. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is lower than Interparfums's net income of $62.3M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 27.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.57x versus 2.91x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 28.28% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 18.21%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 30.73% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $181.07 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.294% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.862%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. United-Guardian pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.7B. United-Guardian's net income of $865.5K is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.58x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 28.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.57x versus 4.95x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.