NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
26
UCTT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$35.91
Seasonality move
:
12.42%
Day range:
$34.40 - $35.70
52-week range:
$31.01 - $56.47
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
437.75x
P/S ratio:
0.79x
P/B ratio:
1.84x
Volume:
858.8K
Avg. volume:
362.5K
1-year change:
11.14%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$1.7B
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
$515.9M | $0.33 | 25.75% | -- | -- |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$1.8B | $0.50 | -5.25% | -20.84% | -- |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
$26M | -$0.06 | 17.16% | -53.33% | -- |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$33M | $0.07 | 26.42% | 27.27% | -- |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$33.1B | $0.75 | 72.04% | 71.51% | $172.80 |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
$147.5M | $0.51 | 31.27% | 9.43% | $68.29 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
$35.02 | -- | $1.6B | 437.75x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.79x |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$25.27 | -- | $6.2B | 17.07x | $0.49 | 1.26% | 0.97x |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
$2.18 | -- | $97.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.99x |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$7.68 | -- | $95M | 34.91x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$134.70 | $172.80 | $3.3T | 53.01x | $0.01 | 0.03% | 29.57x |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
$52.59 | $68.29 | $5.6B | 32.66x | $0.00 | 0% | 11.11x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
36.46% | 3.333 | 26.39% | 1.52x |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
20.92% | 1.803 | 14.53% | 1.80x |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
21.22% | 5.128 | 32.15% | 0.67x |
|
INTT
inTest
|
13.82% | 1.196 | 17.81% | 1.29x |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
11.38% | 2.035 | 0.26% | 3.41x |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
-- | 1.054 | -- | 7.43x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
$93.4M | $25.2M | 0.26% | 0.4% | 4.11% | -$300K |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$272.5M | $149.4M | 7.08% | 9.07% | 8.46% | -$31.3M |
|
AXTI
AXT
|
$5.7M | -$3.4M | -3.21% | -3.81% | -7.91% | -$6.4M |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$14M | $487K | 2.48% | 2.9% | 2.6% | $3.7M |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$26.2B | $21.9B | 106.73% | 126.43% | 63.79% | $16.8B |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
$117.4M | $50.1M | 17.43% | 17.43% | 40.8% | $52.2M |
Ultra Clean Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or AMKR?
Amkor Technology has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 6.58%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 0.4% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity of 9.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings17.28% -$0.05 $1.4B AMKRAmkor Technology14.64% $0.49 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or AMKR?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand Amkor Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.85%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Amkor Technology, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Amkor Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0 0 0 AMKRAmkor Technology3 3 0 -
Is UCTT or AMKR More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.375% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amkor Technology has a beta of 1.845, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.503%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or AMKR?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amkor Technology offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 20.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or AMKR?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are smaller than Amkor Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$2.3M is lower than Amkor Technology's net income of $122.6M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 437.75x while Amkor Technology's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.79x versus 0.97x for Amkor Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.79x 437.75x $540.4M -$2.3M AMKRAmkor Technology0.97x 17.07x $1.9B $122.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or AXTI?
AXT has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of -12.42%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 0.4% beat AXT's return on equity of -3.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings17.28% -$0.05 $1.4B AXTIAXT24.03% -$0.07 $320.3M -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or AXTI?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 138.53%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than Ultra Clean Holdings, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than Ultra Clean Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0 0 0 AXTIAXT0 0 0 -
Is UCTT or AXTI More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.375% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or AXTI?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or AXTI?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are larger than AXT quarterly revenues of $23.6M. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$2.3M is higher than AXT's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 437.75x while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.79x versus 0.99x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.79x 437.75x $540.4M -$2.3M AXTIAXT0.99x -- $23.6M -$2.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or INTT?
inTest has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 1.64%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 0.4% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings17.28% -$0.05 $1.4B INTTinTest46.29% $0.04 $116.5M -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or INTT?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.74%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than inTest, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than inTest.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0 0 0 INTTinTest0 0 0 -
Is UCTT or INTT More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.375% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.712%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or INTT?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or INTT?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are larger than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$2.3M is lower than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 437.75x while inTest's PE ratio is 34.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.79x versus 0.77x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.79x 437.75x $540.4M -$2.3M INTTinTest0.77x 34.91x $30.3M $495K
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or NVDA?
NVIDIA has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 55.04%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 0.4% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings17.28% -$0.05 $1.4B NVDANVIDIA74.56% $0.78 $74.4B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or NVDA?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than NVIDIA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0 0 0 NVDANVIDIA48 4 0 -
Is UCTT or NVDA More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.375% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or NVDA?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or NVDA?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$2.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 437.75x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.79x versus 29.57x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.79x 437.75x $540.4M -$2.3M NVDANVIDIA29.57x 53.01x $35.1B $19.3B
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or RMBS?
Rambus has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 33.44%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 0.4% beat Rambus's return on equity of 17.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings17.28% -$0.05 $1.4B RMBSRambus80.69% $0.45 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or RMBS?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.91%. On the other hand Rambus has an analysts' consensus of $68.29 which suggests that it could grow by 29.85%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Rambus, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Rambus.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0 0 0 RMBSRambus6 1 0 -
Is UCTT or RMBS More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.094, which suggesting that the stock is 109.375% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rambus has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.901%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or RMBS?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rambus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rambus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or RMBS?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.4M, which are larger than Rambus quarterly revenues of $145.5M. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$2.3M is lower than Rambus's net income of $48.7M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 437.75x while Rambus's PE ratio is 32.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.79x versus 11.11x for Rambus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.79x 437.75x $540.4M -$2.3M RMBSRambus11.11x 32.66x $145.5M $48.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.23% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 7.78% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.86% over the past day.
