TDUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -1.28%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of $4.40, signalling upside risk potential of 86.57%. On the other hand Oxford Industries has an analysts' consensus of $81.75 which suggests that it could fall by -5.86%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.693%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxford Industries offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries pays out 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Oxford Industries quarterly revenues of $308M. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oxford Industries's PE ratio is 97.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.47x versus 0.89x for Oxford Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qurate Retail has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -0.98%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Qurate Retail's return on equity of -56.93%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of $4.40, signalling upside risk potential of 86.57%. On the other hand Qurate Retail has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.16%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Qurate Retail, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Qurate Retail.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qurate Retail has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.089%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qurate Retail offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qurate Retail pays out -5.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Qurate Retail quarterly revenues of $2.3B. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Qurate Retail's net income of -$23M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Qurate Retail's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.47x versus 0.01x for Qurate Retail. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -125.86%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of $4.40, signalling upside risk potential of 86.57%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 5.01%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.47x versus 3.09x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of -33.92% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -1.96%. ThredUp's return on equity of -75.52% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity of -48.33%.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of $4.40, signalling upside risk potential of 86.57%. On the other hand Stitch Fix has an analysts' consensus of $5.17 which suggests that it could grow by 4.8%. Given that ThredUp has higher upside potential than Stitch Fix, analysts believe ThredUp is more attractive than Stitch Fix.

ThredUp has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stitch Fix has a beta of 1.993, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.305%.

ThredUp has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stitch Fix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ThredUp pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stitch Fix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ThredUp quarterly revenues are $73M, which are smaller than Stitch Fix quarterly revenues of $318.8M. ThredUp's net income of -$24.8M is lower than Stitch Fix's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, ThredUp's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stitch Fix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ThredUp is 0.47x versus 0.47x for Stitch Fix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.