SKWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assurant has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 4.51%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6% beat Assurant's return on equity of 15.14%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Assurant has an analysts' consensus of $233.20 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that Assurant has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, analysts believe Assurant is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assurant has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.174%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Assurant offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant pays out 23.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $302M, which are smaller than Assurant quarterly revenues of $3B. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M is lower than Assurant's net income of $133.8M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.55x while Assurant's PE ratio is 15.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.91x versus 0.96x for Assurant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 13.04%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.851%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $302M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.55x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 38.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.91x versus 5.87x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of -65.47%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.355%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $302M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.55x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.91x versus 0.38x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 12.14% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 7.46%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6% beat Root's return on equity of -9.03%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.83%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.41%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Root.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $302M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $305.7M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M is higher than Root's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.55x while Root's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.91x versus 1.06x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.